Actions
User story #12341
openchange rule name in technique test
Pull Request:
UX impact:
Suggestion strength:
User visibility:
Effort required:
Name check:
Fix check:
Regression:
Description
Rule naming is quite dumb and is based on "test + x" where x is a number. Now that we can manage to delete rule with the same name as in the tests it could be troublesome if we run successive tests on the same machine.
ie: 1st run will be ok, second one will erase the previous rule and make a new one with different directives.
I think we should set rule name given a simple way like: "test_" + techniqueName in order to make successive tests run possible. Then we will have at least 1 rule per technique tested.
Updated by Félix DALLIDET over 6 years ago
- Status changed from New to In progress
- Assignee set to Félix DALLIDET
Updated by Félix DALLIDET over 6 years ago
- Status changed from In progress to New
- Assignee deleted (
Félix DALLIDET)
Technique name is not easily accessible in the script defining the rule name, best way to set this naming convention is to add a 'name' parameter in the metadata of each test.
Updated by Félix DALLIDET over 6 years ago
- Status changed from New to In progress
- Assignee set to Félix DALLIDET
Actions