Actions
Bug #14271
closed
JS in directive name is executed on rule table if the directive is disabled
Pull Request:
Severity:
Minor - inconvenience | misleading | easy workaround
UX impact:
User visibility:
Infrequent - complex configurations | third party integrations
Effort required:
Priority:
22
Name check:
Fix check:
Regression:
Description
We still have a problem similar to #14221, but not a security one, in the explication of why a rule is disable is the js is in directive name.
Updated by
Actions