Actions
Bug #15125
openRule shown as "Mixed" whereas is is applied only to one audit node
Status:
New
Priority:
N/A
Assignee:
-
Category:
Web - Compliance & node report
Target version:
Pull Request:
Severity:
Major - prevents use of part of Rudder | no simple workaround
UX impact:
User visibility:
Getting started - demo | first install | Technique editor and level 1 Techniques
Effort required:
Medium
Priority:
0
Regression:
No
Description
Found in 5.0.1
Files
Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 4 years ago
- Related to Bug #15124: Rule tag is "Enforce" whereas it has both enforce and audit nodes added
Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 4 years ago
- Related to Bug #14379: Directive appear in "mixed" mode in a rule applied on only one node added
Updated by François ARMAND about 4 years ago
- Subject changed from Rule shown as "Mixed" whereas is is applied olnly to one audit node to Rule shown as "Mixed" whereas is is applied only to one audit node
- Severity set to Major - prevents use of part of Rudder | no simple workaround
- User visibility set to Getting started - demo | first install | Technique editor and level 1 Techniques
- Priority changed from 0 to 70
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 4 years ago
- Target version changed from 5.0.13 to 5.0.14
- Priority changed from 70 to 68
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ almost 4 years ago
- Target version changed from 5.0.14 to 5.0.15
- Priority changed from 68 to 67
Updated by François ARMAND almost 4 years ago
- Effort required set to Very Small
- Priority changed from 67 to 93
Perhaps a missing filter by node, we should at least try to understand the pb in a budget of "very small"
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ almost 4 years ago
- Target version changed from 5.0.15 to 5.0.16
- Priority changed from 93 to 92
Updated by Alexis Mousset over 3 years ago
- Target version changed from 5.0.16 to 5.0.17
- Priority changed from 92 to 88
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 3 years ago
- Target version changed from 5.0.17 to 5.0.18
- Priority changed from 88 to 85
Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 3 years ago
- Assignee set to Benoît PECCATTE
- Target version changed from 5.0.18 to 6.0.8
- Priority changed from 85 to 82
Many things changed since 5.0.1, so retargeting to 6.0 and we first need to try to reproduce it
Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 3 years ago
- Effort required changed from Very Small to Small
- Priority changed from 82 to 71
This still happens in 6.0 - this is because there is One directive in Audit, and 2 directives skipped, and one of them is in Enforce
So we need to be able to identify that some directives are skipped in the computation of Enforce/Audit/Mixed
probably larger than very small
Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 3 years ago
- Effort required changed from Small to Medium
- Priority changed from 71 to 44
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 3 years ago
- Target version changed from 6.0.8 to 6.0.9
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 3 years ago
- Target version changed from 6.0.9 to 6.0.10
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ almost 3 years ago
- Target version changed from 6.0.10 to 798
Updated by Alexis Mousset over 2 years ago
- Target version changed from 798 to 6.1.14
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 2 years ago
- Target version changed from 6.1.14 to 6.1.15
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 2 years ago
- Target version changed from 6.1.15 to 6.1.16
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 2 years ago
- Target version changed from 6.1.16 to 6.1.17
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ almost 2 years ago
- Target version changed from 6.1.17 to 6.1.18
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ almost 2 years ago
- Target version changed from 6.1.18 to 6.1.19
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 1 year ago
- Target version changed from 6.1.19 to 6.1.20
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 1 year ago
- Target version changed from 6.1.20 to 6.1.21
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 1 year ago
- Target version changed from 6.1.21 to old 6.1 issues to relocate
Updated by Benoît PECCATTE 7 months ago
- Assignee deleted (
Benoît PECCATTE) - Priority changed from 44 to 0
- Regression set to No
Actions