Actions
Bug #18008
closed& are not accepted in conditions in the technique editor, but were acccepted before 5.0.x
Pull Request:
Severity:
UX impact:
User visibility:
Effort required:
Small
Priority:
0
Name check:
To do
Fix check:
To do
Regression:
Description
Previously we could use & instead of . in the conditions in the technique editor, it does not seem to still be the case.
This is an issue since it is hard to change every condition without breaking/forgetting anything. Also, whenever I modify an existing technique
using &, the technique editor refuses to save the technique until I change manually all & instances to .
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 4 years ago
- Target version changed from 5.0.18 to 5.0.19
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 4 years ago
- Target version changed from 5.0.19 to 5.0.20
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 4 years ago
- Target version changed from 5.0.20 to 797
Updated by Benoît PECCATTE over 3 years ago
- Target version changed from 797 to 6.1.14
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 3 years ago
- Target version changed from 6.1.14 to 6.1.15
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 3 years ago
- Target version changed from 6.1.15 to 6.1.16
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 3 years ago
- Target version changed from 6.1.16 to 6.1.17
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 3 years ago
- Target version changed from 6.1.17 to 6.1.18
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ almost 3 years ago
- Target version changed from 6.1.18 to 6.1.19
Updated by Alexis Mousset almost 3 years ago
- Status changed from New to Rejected
Too old to fix now.
Actions