Bug #18203: Missing report with directive Scheduled Job - Rudder - Issue Tracker

Actions

Copy link

Bug #18203

open

Missing report with directive Scheduled Job

Added by P C over 4 years ago. Updated 6 months ago.

Status:

New

Priority:

N/A

Assignee:

Category:

Techniques

Target version:

7.3.17

Pull Request:

Severity:

Minor - inconvenience | misleading | easy workaround

UX impact:

User visibility:

Operational - other Techniques | Rudder settings | Plugins

Effort required:

Priority:

Name check:

To do

Fix check:

To do

Regression:

Description

I have
A general setup period of 6hours with 5hours max delay.
and
a scheduled job directive configured liked this (for all my 20 nodes):
Lowest time the command should be run at 1
Highest time the command should be run at 4
Consider the job failed after (minutes) 120
Return codes considered as a success 0
Return codes considered as a repair 1
Return codes considered as an error 2

Regularly, some nodes (not the same ones, most of the time only 1, but can be more) have a compliance message 'missing report'

Related issues 1 (0 open — 1 closed)

Actions

Copy link

Updated by P C about 4 years ago

Subject changed from Missing report with directive Scheduled Job when Opening time shorter then period to Missing report with directive Scheduled Job
Severity changed from Minor - inconvenience | misleading | easy workaround to Major - prevents use of part of Rudder | no simple workaround

I have
A general setup period of 2 hours with 1 hour max delay.
and
2 scheduled job directive configured liked this (for all my 20 nodes):
Job1
Lowest time the command should be run at 1
Highest time the command should be run at 4
Consider the job failed after (minutes) 240
Return codes considered as a success 0
Return codes considered as a repair 1
Return codes considered as an error 2
Job2
Lowest time the command should be run at 0
Highest time the command should be run at 23
Consider the job failed after (minutes) 240
Return codes considered as a success 0
Return codes considered as a repair 1
Return codes considered as an error 2

Regularly, some nodes (not the same ones, most of the time only 1, but can be more) have a compliance message 'missing report', sometime for one job, sometime for both.

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 4 years ago

Some more details:
On a node, with agent schedule every 2 hours, command was executed

2020-09-30T00:50:10+00:00
2020-10-01T00:50:33+00:00
2020-10-02T00:50:03+00:00
2020-10-03T00:51:06+00:00
2020-10-05T00:50:29+00:00

so no run on the 4th and 6th (validated by file touched at beginning of action)

When a job scheduler run was expected, log only says

2020-10-05T00:07:54+00:00 R: @@jobScheduler@@log_info@@xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxx@@yyyy-yyyyy@@0@@None@@job_to_run_zzzz_zzzzz@@2020-10-05 00:07:46+00:00##nodeId@#Scheduling job1_to_run_zzzz_zzzzz was correct
2020-10-05T00:07:54+00:00 R: @@jobScheduler@@log_info@@xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxx@@yyyy-yyyyy@@0@@None@@job_to_run_zzzz_zzzzz@@2020-10-05 00:07:46+00:00##nodeId@#Scheduling Scheduling job2_to_run_zzzz_zzzzz was correct
2020-10-05T00:07:54+00:00 R: @@jobScheduler@@log_info@@xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxx@@yyyy-yyyyy@@0@@Job@@command1@@2020-10-05 00:07:46+00:00##nodeId@#The command will be run at a random time after 00:00 on this node
2020-10-05T00:07:54+00:00 R: @@jobScheduler@@log_info@@xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxx@@yyyy-yyyyy@@0@@Job@@command2@@2020-10-05 00:07:46+00:00##nodeId@#The command will be run at a random time after 00:00 on this node

There are 2 jobs, it might be related

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 4 years ago

Target version set to 6.1.7

Nothing looks weird on the code side, but it could be related to https://github.com/cfengine/core/pull/4257

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 4 years ago

Related to Bug #18732: backport fix on background command execution on agent added

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 4 years ago

Target version changed from 6.1.7 to 6.1.8

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ almost 4 years ago

Target version changed from 6.1.8 to 6.1.9

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ almost 4 years ago

Target version changed from 6.1.9 to 6.1.10

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES almost 4 years ago

lock condition is invalid, it should be !job_scheduler_lock_${iterator}_&RudderUniqueID&
I don't think it would cause the problem here, but it is wrong

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ almost 4 years ago

Target version changed from 6.1.10 to 6.1.11

Actions

Copy link

#10

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ almost 4 years ago

Target version changed from 6.1.11 to 6.1.12

Actions

Copy link

#11

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 3 years ago

Target version changed from 6.1.12 to 6.1.13

Actions

Copy link

#12

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 3 years ago

Target version changed from 6.1.13 to 6.1.14

Actions

Copy link

#13

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 3 years ago

Target version changed from 6.1.14 to 6.1.15

Actions

Copy link

#14

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 3 years ago

Target version changed from 6.1.15 to 6.1.16

Actions

Copy link

#15

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 3 years ago

Target version changed from 6.1.16 to 6.1.17

Actions

Copy link

#16

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 3 years ago

Target version changed from 6.1.17 to 6.1.18

Actions

Copy link

#17

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 3 years ago

Target version changed from 6.1.18 to 6.1.19

Actions

Copy link

#18

Updated by Alexis Mousset almost 3 years ago

Severity changed from Major - prevents use of part of Rudder | no simple workaround to Minor - inconvenience | misleading | easy workaround
User visibility set to Operational - other Techniques | Rudder settings | Plugins
Priority changed from 0 to 27