Actions
Bug #20535
closed
We are recreating ldap object while we could duplicate them, leading to suboptimal perf
Status:
Released
Priority:
N/A
Assignee:
Category:
Performance and scalability
Target version:
Pull Request:
Severity:
UX impact:
User visibility:
Effort required:
Priority:
0
Name check:
To do
Fix check:
Checked
Regression:
Description
in scala-ldap, when we have an LDAP Entry from unboundid, we recreate it, causing a lot of under the hood action to append, but mostly recreating the schema, rather than duplicating it
Also, we should never try to compute their hashcode as it is super expensive, and the dnstring is there and free (and can be hashcoded also)
Updated by 
Updated by 
Updated by
Actions