Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #2215

closed

Commit in git should use the actor as the commiter

Added by François ARMAND over 12 years ago. Updated over 12 years ago.

Status:
Released
Priority:
1 (highest)
Category:
Web - Maintenance
Target version:
Severity:
UX impact:
User visibility:
Effort required:
Priority:
Name check:
Fix check:
Regression:

Description

That would be more meaningful, particulary for archives, see #2214.

Actions #1

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE over 12 years ago

  • Status changed from New to 2
  • Priority changed from N/A to 1 (highest)
  • Target version changed from 24 to 2.4.0~alpha4

I hadn't realized that this wasn't already the case. It seems imperative to me that the author of actions be recorded in the git commits done "on-the-fly" (ideally in the archives too) for 2.4.0. If they are not, we lose the usefulness of the git log, which is our original reason for implementing this: to have one central log that records all changes (including shared-files).

For now, whether this is the actual author field of the git commit, or just a text comment, is not crucial (although it would be much nicer if it was the git committer...).

Actions #2

Updated by François ARMAND over 12 years ago

  • Status changed from 2 to Pending technical review
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100
Actions #3

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE over 12 years ago

  • Assignee set to François ARMAND
Actions #4

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES over 12 years ago

  • Status changed from Pending technical review to Released

This is valid, thank you francois (the %s %s".format(something) has been corrected in a later commit)

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF