Bug #24945: Error when going to group page - Rudder - Issue Tracker

Actions

Copy link

Bug #24945

closed

Error when going to group page

Added by Nicolas CHARLES about 2 months ago. Updated about 1 month ago.

Status:

Released

Priority:

N/A

Assignee:

Clark ANDRIANASOLO

Category:

Web - Compliance & node report

Target version:

8.1.3

Pull Request:

https://github.com/Normation/rudder/p...

Severity:

Major - prevents use of part of Rudder | no simple workaround

UX impact:

I hate Rudder for that

User visibility:

Getting started - demo | first install | Technique editor and level 1 Techniques

Effort required:

Small

Priority:

157

Name check:

To do

Fix check:

Checked

Regression:

Yes

Description

Happens on 8.1

2024-05-29 19:26:27+0000 INFO  net.liftweb.http.LiftServlet - Request for /rudder/secure/api/compliance/summary/groups failed key not found: Rul
eId(RuleUid(hasPolicyServer-root),Revision(default))
zio.FiberFailure: key not found: RuleId(RuleUid(hasPolicyServer-root),Revision(default))
        at scala.collection.immutable.BitmapIndexedMapNode.apply(HashMap.scala:674)
        at scala.collection.immutable.BitmapIndexedMapNode.apply(HashMap.scala:672)
        at scala.collection.immutable.HashMap.apply(HashMap.scala:132)
        at com.normation.rudder.rest.lift.ComplianceAPIService.$anonfun$getByNodeGroupCompliance$19(ComplianceApi.scala:947)
        at scala.collection.immutable.List.map(List.scala:246)
        at scala.collection.immutable.List.map(List.scala:79)
        at com.normation.rudder.rest.lift.ComplianceAPIService.$anonfun$getByNodeGroupCompliance$17(ComplianceApi.scala:934)
        at zio.ZIO.$anonfun$map$2(ZIO.scala:960)
        at com.normation.rudder.rest.lift.ComplianceAPIService.getByNodeGroupCompliance(ComplianceApi.scala:928)
        at com.normation.rudder.rest.lift.ComplianceAPIService.getNodeGroupComplianceSummary(ComplianceApi.scala:1286)
Caused by: java.util.NoSuchElementException: key not found: RuleId(RuleUid(hasPolicyServer-root),Revision(default))
        at scala.collection.immutable.BitmapIndexedMapNode.apply(HashMap.scala:674)
        at scala.collection.immutable.BitmapIndexedMapNode.apply(HashMap.scala:672)
        at scala.collection.immutable.HashMap.apply(HashMap.scala:132)
        at com.normation.rudder.rest.lift.ComplianceAPIService.$anonfun$getByNodeGroupCompliance$19(ComplianceApi.scala:947)
        at scala.collection.immutable.List.map(List.scala:246)
        at scala.collection.immutable.List.map(List.scala:79)
        at com.normation.rudder.rest.lift.ComplianceAPIService.$anonfun$getByNodeGroupCompliance$17(ComplianceApi.scala:934)
        at zio.ZIO.$anonfun$map$2(ZIO.scala:960)
        at zio.internal.FiberRuntime.runLoop(FiberRuntime.scala:904)
        at zio.internal.FiberRuntime.runLoop(FiberRuntime.scala:1024)
        at zio.internal.FiberRuntime.runLoop(FiberRuntime.scala:967)
        at zio.internal.FiberRuntime.runLoop(FiberRuntime.scala:967)
        at zio.internal.FiberRuntime.evaluateEffect(FiberRuntime.scala:381)
        at zio.internal.FiberRuntime.evaluateMessageWhileSuspended(FiberRuntime.scala:504)
        at zio.internal.FiberRuntime.drainQueueOnCurrentThread(FiberRuntime.scala:220)
        at zio.internal.FiberRuntime.run(FiberRuntime.scala:139)
        at zio.internal.ZScheduler$$anon$4.run(ZScheduler.scala:478)
2024-05-29 19:26:27.278:WARN :oejs.HttpChannel:qtp237351678-21: /rudder/secure/api/compliance/summary/groups

Files

clipboard-202405292128-hzubo.png (41.3 KB) clipboard-202405292128-hzubo.png

Nicolas CHARLES, 2024-05-29 21:28

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 2 months ago

I don't have the rules Global configuration for all nodes existing. Might be related

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 2 months ago

Severity set to Major - prevents use of part of Rudder | no simple workaround
UX impact set to I hate Rudder for that
User visibility set to Getting started - demo | first install | Technique editor and level 1 Techniques
Effort required set to Small
Priority changed from 0 to 157
Regression changed from No to Yes