Enhancement #2677: When I enter the "Create a new item" popup to create a group the default field should be Name - Rudder - Issue Tracker

Custom queries

8.1 beta
Bugs triage
My TR
Need technical review
Open bugs (all)
Open bugs (UI - UX)
Open UX defects (all)
Opened by users

Actions

Copy link

Enhancement #2677

closed

When I enter the "Create a new item" popup to create a group the default field should be Name

Added by Jonathan CLARKE almost 12 years ago. Updated 8 months ago.

Status:

Released

Priority:

Assignee:

Raphael GAUTHIER

Category:

Web - Nodes & inventories

Target version:

7.3.6

Pull Request:

https://github.com/Normation/rudder/p...

UX impact:

Suggestion strength:

User visibility:

Effort required:

Name check:

Fix check:

Checked

Regression:

Description

When I click "Create a new item" in the Groups screen, a popup appears. The first field chooses between Group and Category, which defaults to Group. It would be good if the active field was automatically "Name", so that I could quickly create a new group without having to change focus manually.

History
Notes
Property changes
Associated revisions

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Jean VILVER almost 12 years ago

Status changed from 2 to In progress

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Jean VILVER almost 12 years ago

Status changed from In progress to Discussion

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE almost 12 years ago

Jean, why is this ticket in Discussion status, but with no discussion? Is there a problem?

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Jean VILVER almost 12 years ago

Jonathan CLARKE wrote:

Jean, why is this ticket in Discussion status, but with no discussion? Is there a problem?

I couldn't continue to work on the ticket, I had to work on another one, so I change his status to 'In progress' to 'Discussion'.

Should I keep the ticket's status on 'In progress' even if I'm not working on it?

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES almost 12 years ago

Status changed from Discussion to In progress
Assignee changed from Jean VILVER to Nicolas CHARLES

Jean, the status of the ticket depends on what you are doing. If you are not working on it, you should revert to Qualified.
I'm taking over this bug

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES almost 12 years ago

Status changed from In progress to Discussion
Assignee changed from Nicolas CHARLES to Jonathan CLARKE
% Done changed from 0 to 10

I couldn't find a way to do it properly, the conjonction of radio button and popup is a mess.
Still, I corrected the tabindex so that tabing will properly go to the name (on my system it wasn't)
I'm not sure it's that critical for this beta

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE almost 12 years ago

Nicolas CHARLES wrote:

Jean, the status of the ticket depends on what you are doing. If you are not working on it, you should revert to Qualified.
I'm taking over this bug

Actually, it should not be reverted to Qualified, but to "To be started".

"Qualified" means "we've estimated the time to do this ticket, but don't want to start it yet", and "To be started" means "it needs doing!".

"Discussion" means "someone needs to look at this and help me", but of course should have at least one question so that people can actually help you :)

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES almost 12 years ago

Jonathan CLARKE wrote:

Nicolas CHARLES wrote:

Jean, the status of the ticket depends on what you are doing. If you are not working on it, you should revert to Qualified.
I'm taking over this bug

Actually, it should not be reverted to Qualified, but to "To be started".

"Qualified" means "we've estimated the time to do this ticket, but don't want to start it yet", and "To be started" means "it needs doing!".

"Discussion" means "someone needs to look at this and help me", but of course should have at least one question so that people can actually help you :)

The workflow doesn't allow for reverting to "to be started", hence my remark :p

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Jean VILVER almost 12 years ago

Only 3 status was available to me : "Discussion", "In progress" and "Technical Review". That's why I reverted it to "Discussion".

Actions

Copy link

#10

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE almost 12 years ago

So the workflow needs fixing - complain to the guy in charge of it, but please don't use the wrong statuses without trying to fix the underlying problem, that's not a healthy approach.

Actions

Copy link

#11

Updated by Jean VILVER almost 12 years ago

Status changed from Discussion to In progress

Actions

Copy link

#12

Updated by Nicolas PERRON over 11 years ago

Target version changed from 2.4.0~beta3 to 2.4.0~beta4

There is no commit and I don't know the advancement of this issue.

This is not a blocking issue so I changed it to the next run.

Actions

Copy link

#13

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE over 11 years ago

Status changed from In progress to 2
Assignee changed from Jonathan CLARKE to Arthur ANGLADE

This is an annoying bug. Arthur, could you look into it to see if you can make this work?

Actions

Copy link

#14

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE over 11 years ago

Target version changed from 2.4.0~beta4 to 2.4.0~beta5

Actions

Copy link

#15

Updated by Arthur ANGLADE over 11 years ago

Status changed from 2 to Discussion

it seems to be a really complicated problem, involving multi threadings !

Actions

Copy link

#16

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE over 11 years ago

Status changed from Discussion to New
Assignee deleted (~~Arthur ANGLADE~~)
Target version changed from 2.4.0~beta5 to Ideas (not version specific)

After three developers have broken their teeth on this, we're going to discard this for now. An upcoming UI change is planned so that creating Groups and Categories will be done via 2 separate popups, so the first field would be "Name" then anyway.

Thanks for trying, everyone.

Actions

Copy link

#17