Actions
Architecture #27480
openReports from one report may leak to another report
Status:
New
Priority:
4
Assignee:
Category:
Agent
Target version:
Pull Request:
Effort required:
Name check:
To do
Fix check:
To do
Regression:
No
Description
With an agent in change only report, commands report may leak to other report
2025-06-16T16:29:01+00:00 notice: Q: "...rpm -q gpg-pubk": gpg-pubkey-aaaaaa 2025-06-16T16:29:02+00:00 notice: Q: ".../bin/rpm -q gpg": +hook_repo_gpg_key_aaaaaa1_present 2025-06-16T16:29:02+00:00 Q: ".../bin/rpm -q gpg": +hook_repo_gpg_key_aaaaaa2_present 2025-06-16T16:29:02+00:00 Q: ".../bin/rpm -q gpg": +hook_repo_gpg_key_aaaaaa3_present 2025-06-16T16:29:02+00:00 Q: ".../bin/rpm -q gpg": +hook_repo_gpg_key_aaaaaa4_present 2025-06-16T16:29:02+00:00 Q: ".../bin/rpm -q gpg": +hook_repo_gpg_key_aaaaaa5_present 2025-06-16T16:29:02+00:00 Q: ".../bin/rpm -q gpg": +hook_repo_gpg_key_aaaaaa6_present 2025-06-16T16:29:02+00:00 Q: ".../bin/rpm -q gpg": +hook_repo_gpg_key_aaaaaa7_present 2025-06-16T16:29:02+00:00 Q: ".../bin/rpm -q gpg": +hook_repo_gpg_key_aaaaaa8_present 2025-06-16T16:29:02+00:00 Q: ".../bin/rpm -q gpg": +hook_repo_gpg_key_aaaaaa9_present 2025-06-16T16:29:02+00:00 Q: ".../bin/rpm -q gpg": +hook_repo_gpg_key_aaaaaa10_present 2025-06-16T16:29:02+00:00 R: Condition sysctl_reload_false defined 2025-06-16T16:29:02+00:00 error: Only functions returning scalars can be used as arguments 2025-06-16T16:29:03+00:00 error: Only functions returning scalars can be used as arguments 2025-06-16T16:29:03+00:00 error: Only functions returning scalars can be used as arguments 2025-06-16T16:29:03+00:00 R: @@file_custom_dns_server_for_host@@log_repaired@@AAAAAAAAAAAA@@BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB@@aCCCCCCCCCCCCC@@File from a jinja2 template@@/path/to/file~@@2025-06-16 16:29:00+00:00##ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ@#Remove file /var/rudder/cfengine-community/inputs/file_custom_dns_server_for_host/1.0/resources/file.j2.datastate.6596.json was repaired
result in the gpg report being attached in the technical log to the jinja2 reports
It might be in the agent, or in the compliance part
Updated by François ARMAND 23 days ago
- Tracker changed from Bug to Architecture
- Priority changed from To review to 4
- Priority deleted (
0)
So, this is complicated because we don't have the info that we are in change only AND we don't have structured reports.
We can act at relayd level by skipping the log report (skip_event_types
config parameter in relayd config file).
The real correction of that is a big change in report structure so that they are structured and we can attach correctly leaf to their roots, and not try to guess which one is what.
Updated by François ARMAND 23 days ago
- Target version changed from 8.2.9 to Ideas (not version specific)
Actions