Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

Bug #3522

closed

Android support

Added by Cédric Cabessa over 11 years ago. Updated almost 10 years ago.

Status:
Released
Priority:
1 (highest)
Assignee:
Jonathan CLARKE
Category:
Techniques
Target version:
Ideas (not version specific)
Pull Request:
https://github.com/Normation/rudder-t...
Severity:
UX impact:
User visibility:
Effort required:
Priority:
Name check:
Fix check:
Regression:

Description

This pull request contains various fixes for improving the android support

  • run-inventory: use the same method to run inventory on android.
    Send an "intent" to ocsinventory and wait until the file is created.
    The run-inventory script is in the android cfengine repo
    We need a customized version of ocsinventory
    • android support in standard library
      (linux|windows) often use "pure cfengine" promises, so works on any OS (including android)
      Replace by linux|!linux as Suggested by Matthieu
Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by Matthieu CERDA over 11 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Pending technical review
  • Assignee set to Cédric Cabessa
  • Priority changed from N/A to 1 (highest)
  • Target version set to 2.6.0~rc1
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100

This is already a pull request \o/ passing to the Technical review stage then.

Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by Matthieu CERDA over 11 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2.6.0~rc1 to 2.6.0
Actions
Copy link
 #3

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE over 11 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2.6.0 to 2.6.1
Actions
Copy link
 #4

Updated by Nicolas PERRON over 11 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2.6.1 to 2.6.2
Actions
Copy link
 #5

Updated by Nicolas PERRON over 11 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2.6.2 to 2.6.3
Actions
Copy link
 #6

Updated by François ARMAND over 11 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Cédric Cabessa to Nicolas CHARLES
Actions
Copy link
 #7

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES over 11 years ago

This looks grreat, but shouldn't the target of this pull request be 2.5 ? (or even 2.6?) rather than the android branch ?

Actions
Copy link
 #8

Updated by Cédric Cabessa over 11 years ago

Nicolas CHARLES wrote:

This looks grreat, but shouldn't the target of this pull request be 2.5 ? (or even 2.6?) rather than the android branch ?

Those patches are atop of the android branch and will not merge directly in 2.5.

May be you could merge this request in android_2.5 then android_2.5 in 2.5 (this generate some conflicts, but it look manageable).

I tried to merge directly in 2.6, but the result was too scary and didn't look further :-(

Actions
Copy link
 #9

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE over 11 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Nicolas CHARLES to Jonathan CLARKE
Actions
Copy link
 #10

Updated by Nicolas PERRON over 11 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2.6.3 to 2.6.4
Actions
Copy link
 #11

Updated by Nicolas PERRON over 11 years ago

  • Status changed from Pending technical review to Discussion

I don't know how to deal with this. What's your opinion Jon ?

Actions
Copy link
 #12

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE over 11 years ago

  • Status changed from Discussion to Pending technical review

Nicolas PERRON wrote:

I don't know how to deal with this. What's your opinion Jon ?

Thanks for bumping this Nicolas. It needs a Technical Review, and I'm ashamed to say I had forgotten about it.

I'll get on it tomorrow.

Actions
Copy link
 #13

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE over 11 years ago

  • Status changed from Pending technical review to Released
  • Target version changed from 2.6.4 to Ideas (not version specific)

Jonathan CLARKE wrote:

Nicolas PERRON wrote:

I don't know how to deal with this. What's your opinion Jon ?

Thanks for bumping this Nicolas. It needs a Technical Review, and I'm ashamed to say I had forgotten about it.

I'll get on it tomorrow.

Reviewed and merged. Thank you so much for this Cédric !

Note: changed the version to "not version specific", because for now this is just on a separate branch (..._android), so not in any release.

Actions
Copy link
 #14

Updated by Benoît PECCATTE almost 10 years ago

  • Project changed from 24 to Rudder
  • Category changed from Techniques to Techniques
Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF