Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #3870

closed

Technique "Sudo utility configuration": Technique is not correctly reporting when applied by multiple rules

Added by Olivier Mauras about 11 years ago. Updated about 11 years ago.

Status:
Released
Priority:
1 (highest)
Assignee:
Matthieu CERDA
Category:
Techniques
Target version:
Severity:
UX impact:
User visibility:
Effort required:
Priority:
Name check:
Fix check:
Regression:

Description

Here is the correct result when one sudo directive is applied:

2013-08-22 18:17     result_success     default_sudo_settings     Default: sudo settings     sudoersFile     -     The sudoers file did not require any modification
2013-08-22 18:17     result_success     default_sudo_settings     Default: sudo settings     Install     -     sudo already installed
2013-08-22 18:16     result_success     default_sudo_settings     Default: sudo settings     Permissions     it_xx     The group it_xx is already present
2013-08-22 18:16     result_success     default_sudo_settings     Default: sudo settings     Permissions     it_xxx     The group it_xxx is already present

And here is the result when a second one is added in another rule:

2013-08-23 10:31     result_success     default_sudo_settings     Default: sudo settings     sudoersFile     -     The sudoers file did not require any modification
2013-08-23 10:31     result_success     oracle_sudo_settings     Default: Oracle basic     Install     -     sudo already installed
2013-08-23 10:31     result_success     default_sudo_settings     Default: sudo settings     Install     -     sudo already installed
2013-08-23 10:31     result_success     oracle_sudo_settings     Default: Oracle basic     Permissions     it_zz     The group it_zz is already present
2013-08-23 10:31     result_success     default_sudo_settings     Default: sudo settings     Permissions     it_xxx     The group it_xxx is already present
2013-08-23 10:31     result_success     default_sudo_settings     Default: sudo settings     Permissions     it_xx     The group it_xx is already present

Another example with another second rule:

2013-08-23 10:39     result_success     default_sudo_settings     Default: sudo settings     sudoersFile     -     The sudoers file did not require any modification
2013-08-23 10:39     result_success     perforce_sudo_settings     Tuning: Perforce     Install     -     sudo already installed
2013-08-23 10:39     result_success     default_sudo_settings     Default: sudo settings     Install     -     sudo already installed
2013-08-23 10:39     result_success     perforce_sudo_settings     Tuning: Perforce     Permissions     perforce     The user perforce is already present
2013-08-23 10:39     result_success     perforce_sudo_settings     Tuning: Perforce     Permissions     p4_admins     The group p4_admins is already present
2013-08-23 10:39     result_success     default_sudo_settings     Default: sudo settings     Permissions     it_xx     The group it_xx is already present
2013-08-23 10:39     result_success     perforce_sudo_settings     Tuning: Perforce     Permissions     perforce     The user perforce is already present
2013-08-23 10:39     result_success     perforce_sudo_settings     Tuning: Perforce     Permissions     perforce     The user perforce is already present
2013-08-23 10:39     result_success     perforce_sudo_settings     Tuning: Perforce     Permissions     perforce     The user perforce is already present
2013-08-23 10:39     result_success     default_sudo_settings     Default: sudo settings     Permissions     it_xxx     The group it_xxx is already present

I tried changing directive priorities, oracle_sudo_settings has now priority 10 but it hasn't changed anything.
The resulting issue, is that for rudder, the compliance isn't achieved and the reporting show an unknown state.

Actions #1

Updated by Nicolas PERRON about 11 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #2

Updated by Nicolas PERRON about 11 years ago

  • Status changed from New to In progress
  • Assignee set to Nicolas PERRON

Thank for your report, I will look into this. Are these output from the Technical logs ?

Actions #3

Updated by Olivier Mauras about 11 years ago

Yes they are.

Actions #4

Updated by Nicolas PERRON about 11 years ago

I've try to reproduce but my report is not in a 'Unknown' state. Nevertheless, one of the Rule is in 'No answer' which is normal due to the report missing for "sudoersFile".

Actions #5

Updated by Olivier Mauras about 11 years ago

My bad, it's rule that is in "unknown" state, report is indeed in "No answer"

Actions #6

Updated by Nicolas PERRON about 11 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2.7.1 to 2.4.8

This bug exists since the begining of time then the correct branch is 2.4.

I'm on it.

Actions #7

Updated by Nicolas PERRON about 11 years ago

  • Status changed from In progress to Pending technical review
  • Assignee changed from Nicolas PERRON to Matthieu CERDA
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100
  • Pull Request set to https://github.com/Normation/rudder-techniques/pull/176

Pull Request URL added: https://github.com/Normation/rudder-techniques/pull/176

Matthieu, could you review it please ?

Actions #8

Updated by Nicolas PERRON about 11 years ago

  • Status changed from Pending technical review to Pending release

Applied in changeset policy-templates:commit:48debb51deb9d9049cf4e73cc08f998ccad63769.

Actions #9

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE about 11 years ago

Applied in changeset policy-templates:commit:b5ff338974c7595d7206da23fa4c6e41475e6cc2.

Actions #10

Updated by Nicolas PERRON about 11 years ago

  • Subject changed from Sudo techniques not reporting correctly when applied by multiple rules to Technique "Sudo utility configuration": Technique is not correctly reporting when applied by multiple rules
Actions #11

Updated by Nicolas PERRON about 11 years ago

  • Status changed from Pending release to Released

This bug has been fixed in Rudder 2.4.8, which was released today.
Check out:

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF