Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

User story #4210

closed

Order options fstab technique

Added by Dennis Cabooter about 11 years ago. Updated almost 3 years ago.

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
5 (lowest)
Assignee:
-
Category:
Techniques
Target version:
Ideas (not version specific)
Pull Request:
UX impact:
Suggestion strength:
User visibility:
Effort required:
Name check:
Fix check:
Regression:

Description

The fstab technique uses a weird order:

# tail -4 /etc/fstab 
winzfs012:/exports/fsc /pc nfs rw,defaults,_netdev 0 2
winzfs011:/exports/fsb /pb nfs rw,defaults,_netdev 0 2
winzfs013:/exports/fsd /pd nfs rw,_netdev,defaults 0 2
winzfs010:/exports/fsa /pa nfs defaults,_netdev,rw 0 2
Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 11 years ago

Thanks Dennis!

Interesting, What should be a good order ?

Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by Dennis Cabooter about 11 years ago

At the moment, the order of the file systems as well the order of the options are weird, e.g.:

winzfs012:/exports/fsc /pc nfs rw,defaults,_netdev 0 2
winzfs011:/exports/fsb /pb nfs rw,defaults,_netdev 0 2
winzfs013:/exports/fsd /pd nfs rw,_netdev,defaults 0 2
winzfs010:/exports/fsa /pa nfs defaults,_netdev,rw 0 2

Anyhow the order of the options should be the same, e.g.:

winzfs012:/exports/fsc /pc nfs defaults,_netdev,rw 0 2
winzfs011:/exports/fsb /pb nfs defaults,_netdev,rw 0 2
winzfs013:/exports/fsd /pd nfs defaults,_netdev,rw 0 2
winzfs010:/exports/fsa /pa nfs defaults,_netdev,rw 0 2

Ideally the order of the filesystems should be alpha-numeric ordered, e.g.:

winzfs010:/exports/fsa /pa nfs defaults,_netdev,rw 0 2
winzfs011:/exports/fsb /pb nfs defaults,_netdev,rw 0 2
winzfs012:/exports/fsc /pc nfs defaults,_netdev,rw 0 2
winzfs013:/exports/fsd /pd nfs defaults,_netdev,rw 0 2
Actions
Copy link
 #3

Updated by Matthieu CERDA almost 11 years ago

  • Category set to Techniques
  • Status changed from New to Discussion
  • Assignee set to Dennis Cabooter
  • Priority changed from N/A to 5 (lowest)

Hm, the order is a bit odd indeed.

Can you please tel me if some of these entries where here before, or were they all added by Rudder ?

Also, did you change the Technique version recently in your Directive ?

Actions
Copy link
 #4

Updated by Dennis Cabooter almost 11 years ago

The entries were all added by Rudder and I used the technique for the very first time.

Actions
Copy link
 #5

Updated by Benoît PECCATTE over 9 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Dennis Cabooter to Matthieu CERDA
Actions
Copy link
 #6

Updated by Benoît PECCATTE over 8 years ago

  • Target version set to 2.11.21
Actions
Copy link
 #7

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 8 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2.11.21 to 2.11.22
Actions
Copy link
 #8

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 8 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2.11.22 to 2.11.23
Actions
Copy link
 #9

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 8 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2.11.23 to 2.11.24
Actions
Copy link
 #10

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 8 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2.11.24 to 308
Actions
Copy link
 #11

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 8 years ago

  • Target version changed from 308 to 3.1.14
Actions
Copy link
 #12

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 8 years ago

  • Target version changed from 3.1.14 to 3.1.15
Actions
Copy link
 #13

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 8 years ago

  • Target version changed from 3.1.15 to 3.1.16
Actions
Copy link
 #14

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 8 years ago

  • Target version changed from 3.1.16 to 3.1.17
Actions
Copy link
 #15

Updated by Benoît PECCATTE about 8 years ago

  • Assignee deleted (Matthieu CERDA)
Actions
Copy link
 #16

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 8 years ago

  • Target version changed from 3.1.17 to 3.1.18
Actions
Copy link
 #17

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ almost 8 years ago

  • Target version changed from 3.1.18 to 3.1.19
Actions
Copy link
 #18

Updated by Benoît PECCATTE almost 8 years ago

  • Tracker changed from Bug to User story
  • Subject changed from Weird order fstab technique to Order options fstab technique

This is not a bug.

Actions
Copy link
 #19

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 7 years ago

  • Target version changed from 3.1.19 to 3.1.20
Actions
Copy link
 #20

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 7 years ago

  • Target version changed from 3.1.20 to 3.1.21
Actions
Copy link
 #21

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 7 years ago

  • Target version changed from 3.1.21 to 3.1.22
Actions
Copy link
 #22

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 7 years ago

  • Target version changed from 3.1.22 to 3.1.23
Actions
Copy link
 #23

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 7 years ago

  • Target version changed from 3.1.23 to 3.1.24
Actions
Copy link
 #24

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 7 years ago

  • Target version changed from 3.1.24 to 3.1.25
Actions
Copy link
 #25

Updated by Benoît PECCATTE about 7 years ago

  • Target version changed from 3.1.25 to 4.1.9
Actions
Copy link
 #26

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 7 years ago

  • Target version changed from 4.1.9 to 4.1.10
Actions
Copy link
 #27

Updated by Benoît PECCATTE almost 7 years ago

  • Target version changed from 4.1.10 to Ideas (not version specific)
Actions
Copy link
 #28

Updated by Alexis Mousset almost 3 years ago

This won’t be added to that technique, please use the technique editor for that. If you are missing some capabilities in it, please open a ticket for that need.

Actions
Copy link
 #29

Updated by Alexis Mousset almost 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Discussion to Rejected
Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF