Actions
User story #540
closed
Write tests for data-consistencies rules
Status:
Rejected
Priority:
5 (lowest)
Assignee:
-
Category:
Architecture - Code maintenance
Target version:
Pull Request:
UX impact:
Suggestion strength:
User visibility:
Effort required:
Name check:
Fix check:
Regression:
Description
There is a whole lot of consistency rules that could/should be checked, and some even enforced directly by OpenLDAP, like:
- when a node is deleted, all groups containing its ID should be updated;
- when a directive is deleted, all rules containing that directive should be updated;
etc.
We should write tests for all these rules.
Updated by Jonathan CLARKE over 13 years ago
- Category changed from 13 to Architecture - Code maintenance
Updated by Jonathan CLARKE over 12 years ago
- Target version changed from 24 to 18
Updated by François ARMAND about 12 years ago
- Subject changed from Consistence des données to Write tests for data-consistencies rules
- Description updated (diff)
- Target version changed from 18 to 24
Updated by Nicolas CHARLES almost 12 years ago
- Target version changed from 24 to Ideas (not version specific)
Updated by François ARMAND almost 10 years ago
- Status changed from New to Rejected
Actually, my self of now can tell to my self of 4 year ago that checking consistency rules is almost never what you want. You want:
- convergent updates,
- idempotent action,
- sane error handling to get "as much as you can with what you have".
So closing it with "well attempt, little beetle".
Actions