Bug #8626: Adapt DirectiveEditor for master-slave password fields - Rudder - Issue Tracker

Actions

Copy link

Bug #8626

closed

Bug #8593: UserManagement need to have hashed password for both Linux and AIX

Adapt DirectiveEditor for master-slave password fields

Added by François ARMAND almost 8 years ago. Updated over 7 years ago.

Status:

Released

Priority:

Assignee:

Nicolas CHARLES

Category:

Web - Config management

Target version:

3.1.12

Pull Request:

https://github.com/Normation/rudder/p...

Severity:

UX impact:

User visibility:

Effort required:

Priority:

Name check:

Fix check:

Regression:

Description

This subtask of #8593 is in charge of adapting all the UI logic to able to:

- have a master password field (for Linux hash variable) that send user input to a slave password field (for AIX hash variable),
- the password field must not have an actual HTML output

Files

directive.png (26.3 KB) directive.png

directive

Nicolas CHARLES, 2016-07-15 10:53

Actions

Copy link

Updated by François ARMAND almost 8 years ago

Subject changed from Adapt DirectiveEditor for master/slace password fields to Adapt DirectiveEditor for master-slave password fields

Actions

Copy link

Updated by François ARMAND almost 8 years ago

Status changed from In progress to Pending technical review
Assignee changed from François ARMAND to Nicolas CHARLES
Pull Request set to https://github.com/Normation/rudder/pull/1123

PR https://github.com/Normation/rudder/pull/1123

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES almost 8 years ago

File directive.png directive.png added

I think that that output is not the expected on: look at the attached text for the form
directive

Actions

Copy link

Updated by François ARMAND over 7 years ago

Hum, interesting. It is the "expected", because the value of the master password variable IS a linux hash. I will see how I could change the feedback to better explain. I could perhaps output the different values (linux, aix) ?

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES over 7 years ago

François ARMAND wrote:

Hum, interesting. It is the "expected", because the value of the master password variable IS a linux hash. I will see how I could change the feedback to better explain. I could perhaps output the different values (linux, aix) ?

actually, my main concern was the label below. But yes, you are right also

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES over 7 years ago

ha - I have a display problem when migrating from v6.0 to v7.0:
directives has two entries, first one doesn't show the current password hash, second one does

Actions

Copy link