Bug #9736
closedStack overflow on node generation
Description
On user found a case where generation is never ending, with the following stack trace:
[2016-11-24 10:16:39] DEBUG com.normation.rudder.services.policies.PromiseGenerationServiceImpl - Node's target configuration built in 734 ms, start to update rule values. [2016-11-24 10:16:39] DEBUG com.normation.rudder.services.policies.PromiseGenerationServiceImpl - RuleVals updated in 65 ms, start to detect changes in node configuration. [2016-11-24 10:16:39] DEBUG com.normation.rudder.services.policies.PromiseGenerationServiceImpl - Checked node configuration updates leading to rules serial number updates and serial number updated in 11 ms [2016-11-24 10:16:40] INFO com.normation.rudder.services.policies.nodeconfig.NodeConfigurationServiceImpl - Configuration of following nodes were updated, their promises are going to be written: [7357f552-34ee-4b8d-9fa9-54854bbdece0, root] [2016-11-24 10:16:40] ERROR net.liftweb.actor.ActorLogger - Actor threw an exception java.lang.StackOverflowError: null at com.normation.rudder.services.policies.nodeconfig.NodeConfiguration.nodeInfo(NodeConfiguration.scala:67) at com.normation.rudder.services.policies.write.PathComputerImpl$$anonfun$com$normation$rudder$services$policies$write$PathComputerImpl$$recurseComputePath$2.apply(PathComputer.scala:140) at com.normation.rudder.services.policies.write.PathComputerImpl$$anonfun$com$normation$rudder$services$policies$write$PathComputerImpl$$recurseComputePath$2.apply(PathComputer.scala:139) at net.liftweb.common.Full.map(Box.scala:610) at com.normation.rudder.services.policies.write.PathComputerImpl.com$normation$rudder$services$policies$write$PathComputerImpl$$recurseComputePath(PathComputer.scala:139) at com.normation.rudder.services.policies.write.PathComputerImpl$$anonfun$com$normation$rudder$services$policies$write$PathComputerImpl$$recurseComputePath$3$$anonfun$apply$2.apply(PathComputer.scala:148) at com.normation.rudder.services.policies.write.PathComputerImpl$$anonfun$com$normation$rudder$services$policies$write$PathComputerImpl$$recurseComputePath$3$$anonfun$apply$2.apply(PathComputer.scala:141) at net.liftweb.common.Full.flatMap(Box.scala:612) at com.normation.rudder.services.policies.write.PathComputerImpl$$anonfun$com$normation$rudder$services$policies$write$PathComputerImpl$$recurseComputePath$3.apply(PathComputer.scala:141) at com.normation.rudder.services.policies.write.PathComputerImpl$$anonfun$com$normation$rudder$services$policies$write$PathComputerImpl$$recurseComputePath$3.apply(PathComputer.scala:139) at net.liftweb.common.Full.flatMap(Box.scala:612) [....]
We don't know the cause for now, but there is relay, and there was a lot of updates in the node/releay topologie. So Rudder must have badly updated something somewhere, and now there is an infinite loop when trying to generate policies.
The problem was seens in 4.0.0, but most likelly already exists in previous versions.
Updated by François ARMAND almost 8 years ago
- Is duplicate of Bug #9735: Stackoverflow on promise generation added
Updated by François ARMAND almost 8 years ago
So it happens that the node that is leading to the error (7357f552-34ee-4b8d-9fa9-54854bbdece0) is removed:
curl -k -H "X-API-Token: xxxxxxx" https://yourserver/rudder/api/latest/nodes/7357f552-34ee-4b8d-9fa9-54854bbdece0 {"action": "nodeDetails","id": "7357f552-34ee-4b8d-9fa9-54854bbdece0","result": "success","data": {"nodes": [ { "id": "7357f552-34ee-4b8d-9fa9-54854bbdece0" , "hostname": "relay.bal.local" , "status": "removed" , "policyServerId": "root" ... }
Updated by François ARMAND almost 8 years ago
Fully removing by hand the node with the following LDAP command solved the generation problem:
ldapdelete -x -r -D "cn=Manager,cn=rudder-configuration" -W "nodeId=7357f552-34ee-4b8d-9fa9-54854bbdece0,ou=Nodes,ou=Removed Inventories,ou=Inventories,cn=rudder-configuration"
It is not clear at all why the node was taken into accound for policy generation, nor why there was a stack overflow.
One clue is that node : "relay.bal.local" does exsist but with a different id
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ almost 8 years ago
- Target version changed from 4.0.1 to 4.0.2
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ almost 8 years ago
- Target version changed from 4.0.2 to 4.0.3
Updated by Nicolas CHARLES almost 8 years ago
comment suppressed, it's not the correct issue that i'm checking
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ almost 8 years ago
- Target version changed from 4.0.3 to 4.0.4
Updated by Benoît PECCATTE over 7 years ago
- Severity set to Major - prevents use of part of Rudder | no simple workaround
- User visibility set to Infrequent - complex configurations | third party integrations
- Priority set to 24
Updated by François ARMAND over 7 years ago
- Status changed from In progress to New
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 7 years ago
- Target version changed from 4.0.4 to 4.0.5
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 7 years ago
- Target version changed from 4.0.5 to 4.0.6
- Priority changed from 24 to 23
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 7 years ago
- Target version changed from 4.0.6 to 4.0.7
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 7 years ago
- Target version changed from 4.0.7 to 357
Updated by Alexis Mousset over 7 years ago
- Target version changed from 357 to 4.1.6
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 7 years ago
- Target version changed from 4.1.6 to 4.1.7
- Priority changed from 37 to 36
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 7 years ago
- Target version changed from 4.1.7 to 4.1.8
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 7 years ago
- Target version changed from 4.1.8 to 4.1.9
- Priority changed from 36 to 35
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ almost 7 years ago
- Target version changed from 4.1.9 to 4.1.10
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ almost 7 years ago
- Target version changed from 4.1.10 to 4.1.11
Updated by François ARMAND over 6 years ago
- Status changed from New to Rejected
I'm closing this one because #12359 is much more clear in what lead to the stackoverflow.
Updated by François ARMAND over 6 years ago
- Related to Bug #12359: Cannot generate policies when there is a loop in policy server hierharchy (stackoverflow) added
Updated by François ARMAND over 6 years ago
- Related to deleted (Bug #12359: Cannot generate policies when there is a loop in policy server hierharchy (stackoverflow))
Updated by François ARMAND over 6 years ago
- Is duplicate of Bug #12359: Cannot generate policies when there is a loop in policy server hierharchy (stackoverflow) added