Bug #2625
closed
The rudder-passwords.conf should now be generated and managed by the packaging
Description
The rudder-passwords.conf should now be generated and managed by the packaging in rudder-server-root
Updated by Matthieu CERDA almost 12 years ago
- Status changed from In progress to Pending technical review
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Applied in changeset commit:b269d99286e34d750cfa3e516f957425b9d1377a.
Updated by Jonathan CLARKE almost 12 years ago
- Status changed from Pending technical review to Discussion
This is much better, and the commit looks find, except for one thing: why did you remove the random password generation? This is a regression, it means we now will have static password all over again!
Updated by Matthieu CERDA almost 12 years ago
- Assignee changed from Matthieu CERDA to Jonathan CLARKE
Well, I am copying a static file here.
Do you want that the file regenerates during the rudder-init as well ? (aka keep the previous file generation in rudder-init with password generation as well as the packaging initial version)
Updated by Jonathan CLARKE almost 12 years ago
Matthieu CERDA wrote:
What I want is simple:Well, I am copying a static file here.
Do you want that the file regenerates during the rudder-init as well ? (aka keep the previous file generation in rudder-init with password generation as well as the packaging initial version)
- All files should be owned by packaging
- Passwords should be randomly generated
- Rudder should work at all times :)
How it is implemented is up to you!
So, if you change passwords during rudder-init, you must make sure they are immediately applied to all config files - I assume a manual run of cf-agent would suffice.
Updated by Matthieu CERDA almost 12 years ago
- Status changed from Discussion to Pending technical review
- Assignee changed from Jonathan CLARKE to Matthieu CERDA
Well, the discussion status of this ticket prevented the commits to close it automatically it seems. Oh well, I'm doing it manually then.
Updated by Jonathan CLARKE almost 12 years ago
- Status changed from Pending technical review to Discussion
This looks good, aside from one anomaly: why this change?
-if [ -e $LDAPDATA_PATH ]; then /etc/init.d/slapd start &> $TMP_LOG; fi +if [ -e $LDAPDATA_PATH ]; then /etc/init.d/slapd restart &> $TMP_LOG; fi. I don't see any reason for it, and it certainly is not related to this bug.
Updated by Jonathan CLARKE almost 12 years ago
- Target version changed from 47 to 50
Updated by Jonathan CLARKE almost 12 years ago
- Target version changed from 50 to 2.4.0~beta3
Updated by Matthieu CERDA almost 12 years ago
- Assignee changed from Matthieu CERDA to Jonathan CLARKE
I thought it would be consistent with the precedent and following statements in the script.
You are right, it is certainly not relevant. Reverting this.
Updated by Matthieu CERDA almost 12 years ago
- Status changed from Discussion to In progress
- Assignee changed from Jonathan CLARKE to Matthieu CERDA
Updated by Matthieu CERDA almost 12 years ago
- Status changed from In progress to Pending technical review
Applied in changeset commit:1e229ab70940b4aec1505f9814fdabfc5117204a.
Updated by Nicolas PERRON
Updated by Jonathan CLARKE almost 12 years ago
- Status changed from Pending technical review to Released