Rudder

In the following example, to

1.1 - FS
  - 1.1.1 - Modules
      - 1.1.1.2 HFS module => == enforce (reportingLogic == ignoreNA ?)
        block(audit or enforce) CCC ? 
        Audit: 100% N/A
            - block(audit) => 100% N/A
        Enforce:  BBB ?
            - block(enforce)
              - block(step1) AAA ?
                 - gm1 0% (100% error)
                 - gm2 100%
                 - gm3 (100% N/A)
            - block(step2)
               - gm1 100%
            - block(step3)
               - gm1 100%

      - 1.1.1.2 (disabled: N/A) DDD ?

Hypothesis:
AAA: today, that can give 33% (weitghed) or 0% (worst). Say we use the 33% case (typically for an iteration).

Problems:
- BBB: today, we can only have reporting logic that gives 80% (weighted) or 0% (worst case). We need to be able to 33% (worst in compliance)
- CCC: at that level, we want to ignore N/A and use a "worst..." that like in BBB gives 33%.
- DDD: we need to be able to choose if that N/A count (as a success) for 1.1.1 or not, and so if the result is 33% or 66%.

A common trait seems to be that each leaf item is weighted "100", not the number of checks that lead to that, which is opaque.

I don't know if we need a need `reportingLogic` (worst wheighted base 100 or something like that) or count the percent at a level (ie keep the existing reporting logic, but with an additional parameter), or something else.