Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #2563

closed

Rudder server can't be installed on a SLES 11 32bits machine

Added by Nicolas PERRON almost 12 years ago. Updated about 9 years ago.

Status:
Released
Priority:
4
Assignee:
Nicolas PERRON
Category:
Packaging
Target version:
Severity:
UX impact:
User visibility:
Effort required:
Priority:
Name check:
Fix check:
Regression:

Description

On a SLES 11 32 bits machine, zypper complains of dependancies:

libc.so.6(64bits) is needed by rudder-jetty<pre>
Actions #1

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE almost 12 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Discussion

What version did this occur on? 2.3.7? 2.3.8 nightly? 2.4.0~alpha7? 2.4.0~alpha8 nightly?

We have changed our build system between 2.3 and 2.4, so it is very different to solve the problem depending on which version this happened on.

Actions #2

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE almost 12 years ago

  • Subject changed from Rudder server can't be installed on a 32bits machine to Rudder server can't be installed on a SLES 11 32bits machine
Actions #3

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE over 11 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2.3.8 to 2.3.9
Actions #4

Updated by Nicolas PERRON over 11 years ago

When I tried it on 2.3.6, the installation couldn't be done on a SLES 11 32 bits but i'm not sure about the message error. When I tried with a 2.4.0~beta1 version the problem was still here with the message I posted in the issue.

Actions #5

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE over 11 years ago

  • Assignee deleted (Nicolas PERRON)
  • Priority changed from 1 to 4
  • Target version changed from 2.3.9 to 2.4.0~rc1

This is a build problem, because Amazon does not have any 32 bits SLES images... We should give for 2.3, but fix this for 2.4 - we have all the right builder machines, so we should be able to do that.

I'm surprised that this still happens on 2.4, since we build the 32 bits pacakges on a 32 bits machines... I think a new test should be done.

Actions #6

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE over 11 years ago

  • Assignee set to Nicolas PERRON
Actions #7

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE over 11 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2.4.0~rc1 to 2.4.0~rc2
Actions #8

Updated by Nicolas PERRON over 11 years ago

On our latest packages, Rudder is still not installable on a SLES 32 bits:

# zypper install rudder-server-root
Loading repository data...
Reading installed packages...
Resolving package dependencies...

Problem: nothing provides libc.so.6()(64bit) needed by rudder-jetty-1346058198:2.4.0.beta4.git-1.SLES.11.noarch
 Solution 1: do not ask to install a solvable providing rudder-server-root
 Solution 2: break rudder-jetty by ignoring some of its dependencies

Choose from above solutions by number or cancel [1/2/c] (c): c

It could be due to our instruction for building no arch in rudder-jetty.spec:

%define _binaries_in_noarch_packages_terminate_build   0

and/or built on a 64 bits

Actions #9

Updated by Nicolas PERRON over 11 years ago

If I choose the second solution: "break rudder-jetty by ignoring some of its dependencies", the installation work perfectly.

Actions #10

Updated by Nicolas PERRON over 11 years ago

Here is an extract of the output of the build on a 32 bit machine:

[...]
Processing files: rudder-jetty-2.4.0.beta5.git-1
Finding  Provides: /usr/lib/rpm/find-provides rudder-jetty
Finding  Requires: /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires rudder-jetty
Finding  Supplements: /usr/lib/rpm/find-supplements rudder-jetty
Provides: libsetuid.so()(64bit)
Requires(interp): /bin/sh /bin/sh
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
Requires(pre): /bin/sh
Requires(post): /bin/sh
Requires: /bin/bash /usr/bin/env libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit)
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/rudder-jetty-2.4.0.beta5.git-1-root-root
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/rudder-jetty-2.4.0.beta5.git-1-root-root
[...]

And 64 bits libraries are still needed:

# rpm -Uvh rudder-jetty-2.4.0.beta5.git-1.noarch.rpm 
error: Failed dependencies:
    jre >= 1.6 is needed by rudder-jetty-2.4.0.beta5.git-1.noarch
    libc.so.6()(64bit) is needed by rudder-jetty-2.4.0.beta5.git-1.noarch
    libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) is needed by rudder-jetty-2.4.0.beta5.git-1.noarch
    libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) is needed by rudder-jetty-2.4.0.beta5.git-1.noarch
    libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) is needed by rudder-jetty-2.4.0.beta5.git-1.noarch
    libdl.so.2()(64bit) is needed by rudder-jetty-2.4.0.beta5.git-1.noarch

Actions #11

Updated by Nicolas PERRON over 11 years ago

  • Status changed from Discussion to In progress

It seems that a 64 bits binary was in the jetty sources:

# find SOURCES/jetty7/ -type f -exec file {} \; |grep ELF
SOURCES/jetty7/lib/setuid/libsetuid.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, not stripped

RPM tried to know which dependencies are needed for the binaries and to prevent this, we have to do the same than for rudder-agent and add in the spec file:

AutoReq: 0
AutoProv: 0
Actions #12

Updated by Nicolas PERRON over 11 years ago

Shouldn't we change this in rudder 2.3 ? It's a little change and this bug exist on Rudder 2.3

Actions #13

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE over 11 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2.4.0~rc2 to 2.3.9

Nicolas PERRON wrote:

Shouldn't we change this in rudder 2.3 ? It's a little change and this bug exist on Rudder 2.3

Yes, absolutely, we must.

Actions #14

Updated by Nicolas PERRON over 11 years ago

Jonathan CLARKE wrote:

Nicolas PERRON wrote:

Shouldn't we change this in rudder 2.3 ? It's a little change and this bug exist on Rudder 2.3

Yes, absolutely, we must.

Err... we must make this change on Rudder 2.3 or 2.4 ?

Actions #15

Updated by Nicolas PERRON over 11 years ago

  • Status changed from In progress to Pending technical review
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100

Applied in changeset commit:70cdcf231eb72e1acecd052abefa861cb7a5fbf2.

Actions #16

Updated by Nicolas PERRON over 11 years ago

Nicolas PERRON wrote:

Jonathan CLARKE wrote:

Nicolas PERRON wrote:

Shouldn't we change this in rudder 2.3 ? It's a little change and this bug exist on Rudder 2.3

Yes, absolutely, we must.

Err... we must make this change on Rudder 2.3 or 2.4 ?

Didn't see that you changed targeted version :)

Actions #17

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE over 11 years ago

  • Status changed from Pending technical review to Released
Actions #18

Updated by Nicolas PERRON about 11 years ago

  • Project changed from Rudder to 34
  • Category deleted (11)
Actions #19

Updated by Benoît PECCATTE about 9 years ago

  • Project changed from 34 to Rudder
  • Category set to Packaging
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF