User story #2319: add generic names for repositories - Rudder websites - Issue Tracker

Actions

Copy link

User story #2319

closed

add generic names for repositories

Added by Fabrice FLORE-THÉBAULT over 12 years ago. Updated over 9 years ago.

Status:

Released

Priority:

N/A

Assignee:

Jonathan CLARKE

Category:

Target version:

Pull Request:

UX impact:

Suggestion strength:

User visibility:

Effort required:

Name check:

Fix check:

Regression:

Description

Actually we have following repositories:

http://www.rudder-project.org/rpm-2.3
http://www.rudder-project.org/apt-2.3
http://www.rudder-project.org/rpm-2.4
http://www.rudder-project.org/apt-2.4

It means that you have to change repository on the server after each stable release.

With generic names for repositories it would be more sustainable:

http://www.rudder-project.org/rpm-stable 
http://www.rudder-project.org/apt-stable
http://www.rudder-project.org/rpm-devel 
http://www.rudder-project.org/apt-devel

Related issues 1 (0 open — 1 closed)

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE over 12 years ago

I've created http://www.rudder-project.org/rpm-stable and http://www.rudder-project.org/apt-stable as symlinks to the 2.3.6 version (current stable version).

They will be updated when we release new versions.

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE over 12 years ago

Status changed from New to Pending technical review
% Done changed from 0 to 100

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas PERRON over 12 years ago

Don't we have to use apt-devel and rpm-devel ?

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE over 12 years ago

Nicolas PERRON wrote:

Don't we have to use apt-devel and rpm-devel ?

I do not believe that they are pertinent names, since we can "develop" several versions at the same time. apt-2.3-nightly, rpm-2.3-nightly, apt-2.4-nightly seem to make a lot more sense.

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas PERRON over 12 years ago

Jonathan CLARKE wrote:

Nicolas PERRON wrote:

Don't we have to use apt-devel and rpm-devel ?

I do not believe that they are pertinent names, since we can "develop" several versions at the same time. apt-2.3-nightly, rpm-2.3-nightly, apt-2.4-nightly seem to make a lot more sense.

Yes, I agree with you. I think we can close this ticket, now.

Actions

Copy link