Actions
User story #3670
closedSupport IPv6 address in inventory
Status:
Rejected
Priority:
3
Assignee:
-
Category:
Web - Nodes & inventories
Target version:
Pull Request:
UX impact:
Suggestion strength:
User visibility:
Effort required:
Name check:
Fix check:
Regression:
Description
Rudder does not take into accound IPv6 address in Fusion report.
They are reported like that:
<NETWORKS> <DESCRIPTION>eth0</DESCRIPTION> <DRIVER>virtio_net</DRIVER> <IPADDRESS>192.168.100.34</IPADDRESS> <IPADDRESS6>fe80::5054:ff:fef5:dca3/64</IPADDRESS6> <IPDHCP>192.168.100.1</IPDHCP> <IPGATEWAY>192.168.100.1</IPGATEWAY> <IPMASK>255.255.255.0</IPMASK> <IPSUBNET>192.168.100.0</IPSUBNET> <MACADDR>52:54:00:F5:DC:A3</MACADDR> <SLAVES></SLAVES> <STATUS>Up</STATUS> <TYPE>Ethernet</TYPE> <VIRTUALDEV>0</VIRTUALDEV> </NETWORKS>
Updated by François ARMAND over 11 years ago
We just don't collect them when parsing Fusion report:
case Some(desc) => Some( Network( name = desc , ifAddresses = optText(n\"IPADDRESS") match { case None => Seq() case Some(a) => getAddresses(a) } , ifDhcp = optText(n\"IPDHCP").flatMap(getAddressByName( _ )) , ifGateway = optText(n\"IPGATEWAY").flatMap(getAddressByName( _ )) , ifMask = optText(n\"IPMASK").flatMap(getAddressByName( _ )) , ifSubnet = optText(n\"IPSUBNET").flatMap(getAddressByName( _ )) , macAddress = optText(n\"MACADDR") , status = optText(n\"STATUS") , ifType = optText(n\"TYPE") , typeMib = optText(n\"TYPEMIB") , speed = optText(n\"SPEED") ) )
We can either add them in the same IP field as ipv4, or create an ipv6 field for them. Mixing both category could lead to funny result, but creating a new field for them implies modifying LDAP schema (what is fastidious).
Updated by Nicolas PERRON over 11 years ago
- Target version changed from 2.4.7 to 2.4.8
Updated by Nicolas PERRON about 11 years ago
- Target version changed from 2.4.8 to 2.4.9
Updated by Nicolas PERRON about 11 years ago
- Target version changed from 2.4.9 to 2.4.10
Updated by Nicolas PERRON about 11 years ago
- Target version changed from 2.4.10 to 2.4.11
Updated by Nicolas PERRON about 11 years ago
- Target version changed from 2.4.11 to 2.4.12
Updated by Nicolas PERRON about 11 years ago
- Status changed from New to Discussion
- Assignee set to Jonathan CLARKE
I wonder if this is a bug or a feature. I seems to me that this is a feature of a Rudder "ipv6-compatible", isn't ?
Updated by Jonathan CLARKE about 11 years ago
- Tracker changed from Bug to User story
- Subject changed from IPv6 address are ignored. to Support IPv6 address in inventory
- Status changed from Discussion to 8
- Assignee deleted (
Jonathan CLARKE) - Target version changed from 2.4.12 to Ideas (not version specific)
Agreed
Updated by Benoît PECCATTE over 9 years ago
- Category changed from 26 to Web - Nodes & inventories
Updated by Alexis Mousset over 8 years ago
- Is duplicate of Bug #7136: Rudder doesn't store and display the IPV6 of the nodes added
Actions