Bug #5716: Some Directives or Nodes may be missing from the reporting, in non compliance mode, during the "pending" period of time - Rudder - Issue Tracker

Actions

Copy link

Bug #5716

closed

Some Directives or Nodes may be missing from the reporting, in non compliance mode, during the "pending" period of time

Added by Nicolas CHARLES about 10 years ago. Updated almost 10 years ago.

Status:

Rejected

Priority:

N/A

Assignee:

Category:

Web - Compliance & node report

Target version:

3.0.0

Pull Request:

Severity:

UX impact:

User visibility:

Effort required:

Priority:

Name check:

Fix check:

Regression:

Description

Randomly, there are missing Directives or Nodes in the Rules details

Didn't find the cause yet, but it seems some data are not correctly extracted from the expected reports (to confirm)

Files

Download all files

1.png (39 KB) 1.png	config	Nicolas CHARLES, 2014-10-30 17:09
2.png (9.9 KB) 2.png	report	Nicolas CHARLES, 2014-10-30 17:09

Related issues 1 (0 open — 1 closed)

Actions

Copy link Download all files

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 10 years ago

File 1.png 1.png added
File 2.png 2.png added

Here, there is the configuration and reports of directives in a directive
there is one less directives in the reports than in the config

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 10 years ago

This happens in non-compliance mode; and only as long as node don't send there new reports (i prevented my nodes from updating their promises, so they keep sending their old reports, where there were only 3 Directives applied)

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 10 years ago

Subject changed from Some Directives or Nodes may be missing from the reporting, randomly to Some Directives or Nodes may be missing from the reporting, in non compliance mode, during the "pending" period of time

ok, after a while (15 minutes apparently) it does reports current state (unexpected old reports)

i guess I'd like to know that new directive is pending, but it seems hard to track which directive changed (directive added is kind of easy, but directive change isn't as we don't store this info), hence the solution ought to be indeed all applying, or nothing till some nodes were speaking

Actions

Copy link

Updated by François ARMAND about 10 years ago

The missing information is "The report concern the configuration at that time, which was that - and it happens that it is not the current one for the rule".

This information is very important, else you get situation like the one you are describing.

I'm not sure what we want to display (config date at least, that it's not the last too, and perhaps the diff with the actual ? And other things ?) and how.

Actions

Copy link