Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

Bug #14945

closed

Missing index in ldap directory

Added by Nicolas CHARLES over 5 years ago. Updated over 4 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
N/A
Assignee:
François ARMAND
Category:
Performance and scalability
Target version:
5.0.18
Pull Request:
https://github.com/Normation/rudder-p...
Severity:
UX impact:
User visibility:
Effort required:
Priority:
0
Name check:
Fix check:
Regression:

Description

we are missing an index on uuid (at least)
Adding 

index   uuid eq

in slapd.conf improves dynamic group computation, on large directory, from 2m30 to 1m50

going back to what indexes used to be in Rudder 3.0, we reach 1m30, and it feels faster

Related issues 2 (0 open — 2 closed)

Related to Rudder - Bug #14465: Generation fails with "Task FutureTask rejected from ThreadPoolExecutor" due to timeout in JS computationReleasedFrançois ARMANDActions
Related to Rudder - Architecture #17128: review index for LDAPReleasedFrançois ARMANDActions
Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from New to In progress
  • Assignee set to Nicolas CHARLES
Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES over 5 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
  • Status changed from In progress to New
  • Assignee deleted (Nicolas CHARLES)
Actions
Copy link
 #3

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from New to In progress
  • Assignee set to Nicolas CHARLES
Actions
Copy link
 #4

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from In progress to Pending technical review
  • Assignee changed from Nicolas CHARLES to François ARMAND
  • Pull Request set to https://github.com/Normation/rudder-packages/pull/1929
Actions
Copy link
 #5

Updated by François ARMAND over 5 years ago

  • Related to Bug #14465: Generation fails with "Task FutureTask rejected from ThreadPoolExecutor" due to timeout in JS computation added
Actions
Copy link
 #6

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from Pending technical review to Discussion

Putting it on hold, as the impact is non existent on most systems

Actions
Copy link
 #7

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 5 years ago

  • Target version changed from 5.0.12 to 5.0.13
Actions
Copy link
 #8

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 5 years ago

  • Target version changed from 5.0.13 to 5.0.14
Actions
Copy link
 #9

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 5 years ago

  • Target version changed from 5.0.14 to 5.0.15
Actions
Copy link
 #10

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ almost 5 years ago

  • Target version changed from 5.0.15 to 5.0.16
Actions
Copy link
 #11

Updated by Alexis Mousset almost 5 years ago

  • Target version changed from 5.0.16 to 5.0.17
Actions
Copy link
 #12

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES over 4 years ago

Actions
Copy link
 #13

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 4 years ago

  • Target version changed from 5.0.17 to 5.0.18
Actions
Copy link
 #14

Updated by François ARMAND over 4 years ago

  • Status changed from Discussion to Resolved

Closin this one as a duplicate of #17128

Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF