Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #18565

closed

The password should not be required for LDAP users

Added by Elaad FURREEDAN about 4 years ago. Updated over 1 year ago.

Status:
Released
Priority:
N/A
Target version:
Severity:
UX impact:
User visibility:
Operational - other Techniques | Rudder settings | Plugins
Effort required:
Priority:
0
Name check:
To do
Fix check:
To do
Regression:

Description

We shouldn't require a password when we create or update a user that doesn't have file as main authentification provider.

As we don't know what user are only LDAP, we will adopt the following strategy:

- if there is only non file providers (for ex only LDAP), the password fied if not displayed,
- if there is both providers, and file is the first: ask for password,
- if there is both providers, and file is not the first: for new users, hide the password but provide a checkbox with a text like "provide a password for local authorisation" (which show the pass in that case). If the checkbox is not checked, but save the provider name in for the password value; And if the user already exists, if the pass is the name of a provider or empty, don't display it.


Related issues 1 (1 open0 closed)

Related to User management - Bug #24219: Display user detail using information from databasePending releaseFrançois ARMANDActions
Actions #1

Updated by François ARMAND about 4 years ago

  • Tracker changed from Bug to User story
  • Description updated (diff)
  • User visibility set to Operational - other Techniques | Rudder settings | Plugins
  • Priority deleted (0)
  • Suggestion strength set to Want - This would make my life a lot easier but I can manage without
Actions #2

Updated by Elaad FURREEDAN almost 4 years ago

  • Status changed from New to In progress
Actions #3

Updated by Elaad FURREEDAN over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from In progress to New
Actions #4

Updated by Elaad FURREEDAN over 3 years ago

  • Tracker changed from User story to Bug
  • Suggestion strength deleted (Want - This would make my life a lot easier but I can manage without)
  • Priority set to 0
Actions #7

Updated by Elaad FURREEDAN over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Pending technical review
  • Assignee changed from Elaad FURREEDAN to Vincent MEMBRÉ
  • Pull Request set to https://github.com/Normation/rudder-plugins/pull/386
Actions #8

Updated by Elaad FURREEDAN about 3 years ago

  • Translation missing: en.field_tag_list set to Sponsored
Actions #9

Updated by Anonymous almost 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Pending technical review to Pending release
Actions #11

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 1 year ago

  • Status changed from Pending release to Released
Actions #12

Updated by Clark ANDRIANASOLO 10 months ago

  • Related to Bug #24219: Display user detail using information from database added
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF