Bug #2244
closed
Date of PT/PI/CR/Group archives is not valid
Added by Jonathan CLARKE about 12 years ago.
Updated about 12 years ago.
Category:
Web - Maintenance
Description
Unless February 36th is a new kind of leap year (in the future)...
Files
Ah, silly you, of course that should be read "2012, February, 36th days of the year".
Or perhaps a developer misused "DD" in place of "dd" in a date format string...
- Status changed from 2 to In progress
- Assignee set to François ARMAND
- Status changed from In progress to Pending technical review
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
- Status changed from Pending technical review to Discussion
Looks OK to me, but didn't we decide to store the date format in one central place to avoid this kind of problem?
Well, here we have a date and time format, not only a date - but ok, its a really weak argument.
I believe I add a far better one when I choose to not use the standard date formatter, I just can't remember it now. Perhaps something to do with the ordering of the dates, but I'm not sure.
I let it open, and will come back to it if I don't find any good reason to not do so.
- Status changed from Discussion to In progress
- Status changed from In progress to Pending technical review
- Status changed from Pending technical review to Released
This loooks valid, thank you Francois !
Also available in: Atom
PDF
Updated by 
Updated by 
Updated by