Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #4393

closed

The default disclaimer message loaded initially into LDAP has an invalid charachter in it

Added by Alex Tkachenko almost 11 years ago. Updated over 10 years ago.

Status:
Released
Priority:
N/A
Category:
Web - Config management
Target version:
Severity:
UX impact:
User visibility:
Effort required:
Priority:
Name check:
Fix check:
Regression:

Description

This issue is similar to the one addressed by http://www.rudder-project.org/redmine/issues/4032, however unlike that one, the typo is not in the policy but in the ldif file used to seed the LDAP database (file rudder-sources/rudder/rudder-core/src/main/resources/ldap/bootstrap.ldif).

When applied, the files have the line "...infrastructure to change back the server?s...".

What is annoying - after the parameter is changed manually via the web interface, the files touched by the disclaimer rule have both the correct and incorrect disclaimers and require manual intervention to fix affected files across the entire network population.


Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Related to Rudder - Bug #4381: Special characters (ie, accents such as éèùô) are replaced by "?" in CFEngine promisesReleasedNicolas CHARLES2014-01-16Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Alex Tkachenko almost 11 years ago

Note that the ldif file has the message encoded (I assume in the Unicode) so it is not directly evident.

Actions #2

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES almost 11 years ago

  • Category set to Web - Config management

Thank you Alex for this bug report, indeed the stored ' is a ’ (non standart quote)

It hsould not fail, but it seems related to http://www.rudder-project.org/redmine/issues/4381 (non ascii text not always written)

Actions #3

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES almost 11 years ago

  • Status changed from New to 8

Jon, which version should have a change in it ?
I believe we shouldn't do migration script (for it would duplicate the header), but should we dot he change in 2.10 or in 2.7 (when parameters where introduced)

Actions #4

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES almost 11 years ago

  • Assignee set to Jonathan CLARKE
Actions #5

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE almost 11 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Jonathan CLARKE to Nicolas CHARLES

Nicolas CHARLES wrote:

Jon, which version should have a change in it ?
I believe we shouldn't do migration script (for it would duplicate the header), but should we dot he change in 2.10 or in 2.7 (when parameters where introduced)

I agree that we shouldn't write a migration for this - it would cause a lot of unwanted changes to files.

Let's change it for new installs (ie in the LDIF files, IIRC), from the branch where it appeared (2.7 IIUC).

Actions #6

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES almost 11 years ago

  • Target version set to 2.8.3
Actions #7

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES almost 11 years ago

  • Status changed from 8 to Pending technical review
  • Assignee changed from Nicolas CHARLES to François ARMAND
  • Pull Request set to https://github.com/Normation/rudder/pull/437
Actions #8

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES almost 11 years ago

  • Status changed from Pending technical review to Pending release
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100
Actions #10

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 10 years ago

  • Status changed from Pending release to Released

This bug has been fixed in Rudder 2.8.3, which was released today.
Check out:

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF