Actions
User story #6368
closed
Methods named check_* should have an equivalent without reporting
Status:
Resolved
Priority:
N/A
Assignee:
-
Category:
Generic methods
Target version:
Pull Request:
UX impact:
Suggestion strength:
User visibility:
Effort required:
Name check:
Fix check:
Regression:
No
Description
Methods such as file_check_exists report on their result whereas we may not want to.
There are 2 use cases :
- we want the file to be present and we want the method to tell us if not
- we want to know wether the file is present or not and take an action based on this
The second case is a new methods.
We could name them does_* instead of check_*, for example file_does_exist
Updated by François ARMAND over 8 years ago
- Has duplicate Architecture #8683: check_* methods output error messages when the result of a check is "no" added
Updated by Alexis Mousset almost 8 years ago
- Target version changed from 0.x to master
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 7 years ago
- Target version changed from master to 4.2.2
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 7 years ago
- Target version changed from 4.2.2 to 4.2.3
Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ almost 7 years ago
- Target version changed from 4.2.3 to 4.2.4
Updated by Benoît PECCATTE almost 7 years ago
- Target version changed from 4.2.4 to Ideas (not version specific)
Updated by Benoît PECCATTE about 3 years ago
- Project changed from 41 to Rudder
- Category changed from Generic methods to Generic methods
Updated by Alexis Mousset about 1 year ago
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- Regression set to No
we can now disable reporting
Actions