Bug #8953: Virtual machines considered as physical nodes - Rudder - Issue Tracker

Actions

Copy link

Bug #8953

closed

Virtual machines considered as physical nodes

Added by Alexandre Anriot about 8 years ago. Updated about 8 years ago.

Status:

Released

Priority:

N/A

Assignee:

Alexis Mousset

Category:

Web - Nodes & inventories

Target version:

3.1.14

Pull Request:

https://github.com/Normation/rudder-p...

Severity:

UX impact:

User visibility:

Effort required:

Priority:

Name check:

Fix check:

Regression:

Description

Hello,

I don't know if it's related to #7204 or not but I have some Debian 8 VMs which are detected as physical nodes:

General

Hostname: XXXXXX.YYYYYY.ZZZZZZ
Machine type: Physical machine
Manufacturer: VMware, Inc.
Total physical memory (RAM): 3.87 GB
Total swap space: 4 GB
Motherboard UUID: cf52a288-84b9-b647-2c32-XXXXXXXXXXXX
System Serial Number: VMware-42 27 3a 64 02 76 f8 77-5b 36 a0 4d 00 XX XX XX

Operating system details

Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 8.5 (jessie)
Operating System Type: Linux
Operating System Name: Debian
Operating System Version: 8.5
Operating System Service Pack: None
Operating System Architecture Description: x86_64-linux-thread-multi

The issue is not very urgent for us, as we are using the manufacturer field to build a dynamic group, because of:
[[https://www.rudder-project.org/redmine/issues/6972]]

Cheers,

Subtasks 1 (0 open — 1 closed)

Related issues 1 (0 open — 1 closed)

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Alexandre Anriot about 8 years ago

Subject changed from Virtual machines considered as "physical" ones to Virtual machines considered as "physical" nodes

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Alexandre Anriot about 8 years ago

Subject changed from Virtual machines considered as "physical" nodes to Virtual machines considered as physical nodes

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Florian Heigl about 8 years ago

I have the same issue with KVM VMs.
Can be detected via BIOS "Name" (not vendor iirc) KVM.

Didn't remember to report but now I feel those could be related.

Actions

Copy link

Updated by François ARMAND about 8 years ago

Thanks for reporting. We will check if it was corrected upstream and/or correct it.

Could you already send us the "dmesg" output (at least anything talking about virtual machine :).

Thanks,

Actions

Copy link

Updated by François ARMAND about 8 years ago

Category set to Web - Nodes & inventories
Assignee set to Nicolas CHARLES
Target version set to 3.1.14

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 8 years ago

From Florian's file, dmseg contains the line VMware vmxnet3 virtual NIC driver, but we match VMware vmxnet virtual NIC driver.
So i'm at least fixing this one

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Alexandre Anriot about 8 years ago

Nicolas CHARLES wrote:

From Florian's file, dmseg contains the line VMware vmxnet3 virtual NIC driver, but we match VMware vmxnet virtual NIC driver.
So i'm at least fixing this one

Hello Nicolas,

On my side, I have a mix of vmxnet3 and e1000 NICs. Could it be possible to check the MAC addresses vendors instead?

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 8 years ago

Alexandre Anriot wrote:

Nicolas CHARLES wrote:

From Florian's file, dmseg contains the line VMware vmxnet3 virtual NIC driver, but we match VMware vmxnet virtual NIC driver.
So i'm at least fixing this one

Hello Nicolas,

On my side, I have a mix of vmxnet3 and e1000 NICs. Could it be possible to check the MAC addresses vendors instead?

Hello Alexandre

Could you send me the output of dmesg | grep VMware, plus the inventories that are not correctly detected (they may contain sensitive data, so you can send them to me by mail directly)

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 8 years ago

Status changed from New to In progress

Actions

Copy link

#10

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 8 years ago

Status changed from In progress to Pending technical review
Assignee changed from Nicolas CHARLES to Alexis Mousset
Pull Request set to https://github.com/Normation/rudder-packages/pull/1059

PR https://github.com/Normation/rudder-packages/pull/1059

Actions

Copy link

#11

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 8 years ago

see http://forge.fusioninventory.org/issues/3046

Actions

Copy link

#12

Updated by Alexandre Anriot about 8 years ago

Hello Nicolas,

Here is the output:
[ 1.826215] VMware PVSCSI driver - version 1.0.5.0-k [ 1.833681] VMware vmxnet3 virtual NIC driver - version 1.2.0.0-k-NAPI [ 1.871532] scsi0 : VMware PVSCSI storage adapter rev 2, req/cmp/msg rings: 8/8/1 pages, cmd_per_lun=254 [ 1.871630] vmw_pvscsi 0000:03:00.0: VMware PVSCSI rev 2 host #0 [ 1.872060] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access VMware Virtual disk 1.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 2 [ 2.003886] ata2.00: ATAPI: VMware Virtual IDE CDROM Drive, 00000001, max UDMA/33 [ 2.012616] scsi 2:0:0:0: CD-ROM NECVMWar VMware IDE CDR10 1.00 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 [ 94.879284] systemd[1]: Detected virtualization 'vmware'.

Nicolas CHARLES wrote:

Hello Alexandre

Could you send me the output of dmesg | grep VMware, plus the inventories that are not correctly detected (they may contain sensitive data,
so you can send them to me by mail directly)

Actions

Copy link

#13

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 8 years ago

Alexandre Anriot wrote:

Hello Nicolas,

Here is the output:
[ 1.826215] VMware PVSCSI driver - version 1.0.5.0-k [ 1.833681] VMware vmxnet3 virtual NIC driver - version 1.2.0.0-k-NAPI [ 1.871532] scsi0 : VMware PVSCSI storage adapter rev 2, req/cmp/msg rings: 8/8/1 pages, cmd_per_lun=254 [ 1.871630] vmw_pvscsi 0000:03:00.0: VMware PVSCSI rev 2 host #0 [ 1.872060] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access VMware Virtual disk 1.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 2 [ 2.003886] ata2.00: ATAPI: VMware Virtual IDE CDROM Drive, 00000001, max UDMA/33 [ 2.012616] scsi 2:0:0:0: CD-ROM NECVMWar VMware IDE CDR10 1.00 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 [ 94.879284] systemd[1]: Detected virtualization 'vmware'.

Awesome, so propoed fix will detect the "VMware vmxnet3 virtual NIC driver" line, and node will be detected as Virtual

Actions

Copy link

#14