Bug #15125: Rule shown as "Mixed" whereas applied to one audit node and one (skipped) enforce directive - Rudder - Issue Tracker

Custom queries

8.1 beta
Bugs triage
CS - by priority
CS - to review
My TR
Need technical review
Open bugs (all)
Open bugs (UI - UX)
Open UX defects (all)
Opened by users

Actions

Copy link

Bug #15125

open

Rule shown as "Mixed" whereas applied to one audit node and one (skipped) enforce directive

Added by Benoît PECCATTE over 5 years ago. Updated 5 months ago.

Status:

New

Priority:

N/A

Assignee:

Category:

Web - Compliance & node report

Target version:

7.3.17

Pull Request:

Severity:

Minor - inconvenience | misleading | easy workaround

UX impact:

User visibility:

Infrequent - complex configurations | third party integrations

Effort required:

Medium

Priority:

Name check:

To do

Fix check:

To do

Regression:

Description

Found in 5.0.1

Files

Download all files

bug_tag3.png (6.53 KB) bug_tag3.png		Benoît PECCATTE, 2019-06-26 09:59
bug_tag4.png (18.7 KB) bug_tag4.png		Benoît PECCATTE, 2019-06-26 09:59
clipboard-202311091717-qhzn0.png (82.2 KB) clipboard-202311091717-qhzn0.png		François ARMAND, 2023-11-09 17:17

Related issues 3 (0 open — 3 closed)

Related to Rudder - Bug #15124: Rule tag is "Enforce" whereas it has both enforce and audit nodes	Released	Nicolas CHARLES	Actions
Related to Rudder - Bug #14379: Directive appear in "mixed" mode in a rule applied on only one node	Released	Nicolas CHARLES	Actions
Related to Rudder - Bug #22525: Directives applied twice don't show in rule details (they should be skipped)	Released	Elaad FURREEDAN	Actions

Issue # Delay: days Cancel

History
Notes
Property changes

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES over 5 years ago

Target version set to 5.0.13

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES over 5 years ago

Related to Bug #15124: Rule tag is "Enforce" whereas it has both enforce and audit nodes added

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES over 5 years ago

Related to Bug #14379: Directive appear in "mixed" mode in a rule applied on only one node added

Actions

Copy link

Updated by François ARMAND over 5 years ago

Subject changed from Rule shown as "Mixed" whereas is is applied olnly to one audit node to Rule shown as "Mixed" whereas is is applied only to one audit node
Severity set to Major - prevents use of part of Rudder | no simple workaround
User visibility set to Getting started - demo | first install | Technique editor and level 1 Techniques
Priority changed from 0 to 70

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 5 years ago

Target version changed from 5.0.13 to 5.0.14
Priority changed from 70 to 68

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 5 years ago

Target version changed from 5.0.14 to 5.0.15
Priority changed from 68 to 67

Actions

Copy link

Updated by François ARMAND about 5 years ago

Effort required set to Very Small
Priority changed from 67 to 93

Perhaps a missing filter by node, we should at least try to understand the pb in a budget of "very small"

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ almost 5 years ago

Target version changed from 5.0.15 to 5.0.16
Priority changed from 93 to 92

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Alexis Mousset almost 5 years ago

Target version changed from 5.0.16 to 5.0.17
Priority changed from 92 to 88

Actions

Copy link

#10

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 4 years ago

Target version changed from 5.0.17 to 5.0.18
Priority changed from 88 to 85

Actions

Copy link

#11

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES over 4 years ago

Assignee set to Benoît PECCATTE
Target version changed from 5.0.18 to 6.0.8
Priority changed from 85 to 82

Many things changed since 5.0.1, so retargeting to 6.0 and we first need to try to reproduce it

Actions

Copy link

#12

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES over 4 years ago

Effort required changed from Very Small to Small
Priority changed from 82 to 71

This still happens in 6.0 - this is because there is One directive in Audit, and 2 directives skipped, and one of them is in Enforce
So we need to be able to identify that some directives are skipped in the computation of Enforce/Audit/Mixed

probably larger than very small

Actions

Copy link

#13

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES over 4 years ago

Effort required changed from Small to Medium
Priority changed from 71 to 44

Actions

Copy link

#14

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 4 years ago

Target version changed from 6.0.8 to 6.0.9

Actions

Copy link

#15

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 4 years ago

Target version changed from 6.0.9 to 6.0.10

Actions

Copy link

#16

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 4 years ago

Target version changed from 6.0.10 to 798

Actions

Copy link

#17

Updated by Alexis Mousset over 3 years ago

Target version changed from 798 to 6.1.14

Actions

Copy link

#18

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 3 years ago

Target version changed from 6.1.14 to 6.1.15

Actions

Copy link

#19

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 3 years ago

Target version changed from 6.1.15 to 6.1.16

Actions

Copy link

#20

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 3 years ago

Target version changed from 6.1.16 to 6.1.17

Actions

Copy link

#21

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ about 3 years ago

Target version changed from 6.1.17 to 6.1.18

Actions

Copy link

#22

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ almost 3 years ago

Target version changed from 6.1.18 to 6.1.19

Actions

Copy link

#23

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 2 years ago

Target version changed from 6.1.19 to 6.1.20

Actions

Copy link

#24

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 2 years ago

Target version changed from 6.1.20 to 6.1.21

Actions

Copy link

#25

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 2 years ago

Target version changed from 6.1.21 to old 6.1 issues to relocate

Actions

Copy link

#26

Updated by Benoît PECCATTE over 1 year ago

Assignee deleted (~~Benoît PECCATTE~~)
Priority changed from 44 to 0
Regression set to No

Actions

Copy link

#27

Updated by François ARMAND about 1 year ago

Subject changed from Rule shown as "Mixed" whereas is is applied only to one audit node to Rule shown as "Mixed" whereas applied to one audit node and one (skipped) enforce directive

It is still the case as of 7.3.9, but the main problem is that "skipped" directive are not displayed, when they really should.

Correcting #22525 will help with that one (and then, I'm not sure we want to change the behavior of mixed without making a clear distinction between "what is the status of the applied directive to the rule (ie compliance)" and "what is the status of the configured directive for the rule" (where "mixed" is correct)

Actions

Copy link

#28

Updated by François ARMAND about 1 year ago

File clipboard-202311091717-qhzn0.png clipboard-202311091717-qhzn0.png added
Target version changed from old 6.1 issues to relocate to 7.3.10
Severity changed from Major - prevents use of part of Rudder | no simple workaround to Minor - inconvenience | misleading | easy workaround
User visibility changed from Getting started - demo | first install | Technique editor and level 1 Techniques to Infrequent - complex configurations | third party integrations