Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #20828

closed

Architecture #20747: Use a unique id to identify reports

Unexpected/missing for same component, same value

Added by François ARMAND about 2 years ago. Updated about 2 years ago.

Status:
Released
Priority:
N/A
Category:
Web - Compliance & node report
Target version:
Severity:
UX impact:
User visibility:
Effort required:
Priority:
0
Name check:
To do
Fix check:
To do
Regression:

Description

In the following case, we get 1 success, 1 missing, 1 unexpected because the expected reports are not correctly generated: we have 3 times 'vim' in place of two time htop and one time vim:

[2022-02-25 15:34:29+0000] TRACE explain_compliance.root - Expected reports for rule '32377fd7-02fd-43d0-aab7-28460a91347b':
 [expected] DirectiveExpectedReports(DirectiveId(DirectiveUid(2947648e-2521-473d-9274-07bd5c38a701),Revision(default)),None,false,List(
  ValueExpectedReport(Package present,List(ExpectedValueId(vim,dd3d7bf4-231d-4434-ad80-61367690f0da))), 
  ValueExpectedReport(Package present,List(ExpectedValueId(vim,4a542919-f5a0-43b6-a756-fa8d96e758db))), 
  ValueExpectedReport(Package present,List(ExpectedValueId(vim,26d74f7b-673a-4554-82ee-6e7bfb56433d)))))

[2022-02-25 15:34:29+0000] TRACE explain_compliance.root - Reports for rule '32377fd7-02fd-43d0-aab7-28460a91347b':
 [report] ResultSuccessReport(2022-02-25T15:34:28.000Z,RuleId(RuleUid(32377fd7-02fd-43d0-aab7-28460a91347b),Revision(default)),DirectiveId(DirectiveUid(2947648e-2521-473d-9274-07bd5c38a701),Revision(default)),NodeId(root),dd3d7bf4-231d-4434-ad80-61367690f0da,Package present,htop,2022-02-25T15:34:25.000Z,Presence of package htop in any version  was correct)
 [report] ResultSuccessReport(2022-02-25T15:34:28.000Z,RuleId(RuleUid(32377fd7-02fd-43d0-aab7-28460a91347b),Revision(default)),DirectiveId(DirectiveUid(2947648e-2521-473d-9274-07bd5c38a701),Revision(default)),NodeId(root),4a542919-f5a0-43b6-a756-fa8d96e758db,Package present,htop,2022-02-25T15:34:25.000Z,Presence of package htop in any version  was correct)
 [report] ResultSuccessReport(2022-02-25T15:34:28.000Z,RuleId(RuleUid(32377fd7-02fd-43d0-aab7-28460a91347b),Revision(default)),DirectiveId(DirectiveUid(2947648e-2521-473d-9274-07bd5c38a701),Revision(default)),NodeId(root),26d74f7b-673a-4554-82ee-6e7bfb56433d,Package present,vim,2022-02-25T15:34:25.000Z,Presence of package vim in any version  was correct)

[2022-02-25 15:34:29+0000] TRACE explain_compliance.root - Compliance for rule '32377fd7-02fd-43d0-aab7-28460a91347b': [[root: 32377fd7-02fd-43d0-aab7-28460a91347b; run: 2022-02-25T15:34:25.000Z;20220225-153403-b10c0977->2022-02-25T15:44:25.000Z]
  compliance:[p:0 s:1 r:0 e:0 u:2 m:2 nr:0 na:0 rd:0 c:0 ana:0 nc:0 ae:0 bpm:0]
  [2947648e-2521-473d-9274-07bd5c38a701 =>
    Package present:[htop(<-> htop):[Unexpected:"Presence of package htop in any version  was correct"],vim(<-> vim):[Missing:"[Missing report #0]"]]
    Package present:[htop(<-> htop):[Unexpected:"Presence of package htop in any version  was correct"],vim(<-> vim):[Missing:"[Missing report #0]"]]
    Package present:[vim(<-> vim):[Success:"Presence of package vim in any version  was correct"]]
]]

It's OK if we use exactly same component name and values:

[2022-02-25 15:34:05+0000] TRACE explain_compliance.root - Expected reports for rule '32377fd7-02fd-43d0-aab7-28460a91347b':
 [expected] DirectiveExpectedReports(DirectiveId(DirectiveUid(2947648e-2521-473d-9274-07bd5c38a701),Revision(default)),None,false,List(
ValueExpectedReport(htop,List(ExpectedValueId(htop,dd3d7bf4-231d-4434-ad80-61367690f0da))), 
ValueExpectedReport(htop,List(ExpectedValueId(htop,4a542919-f5a0-43b6-a756-fa8d96e758db))), 
ValueExpectedReport(vim,List(ExpectedValueId(vim,26d74f7b-673a-4554-82ee-6e7bfb56433d)))))

[2022-02-25 15:34:05+0000] TRACE explain_compliance.root - Reports for rule '32377fd7-02fd-43d0-aab7-28460a91347b':
 [report] ResultSuccessReport(2022-02-25T15:30:58.000Z,RuleId(RuleUid(32377fd7-02fd-43d0-aab7-28460a91347b),Revision(default)),DirectiveId(DirectiveUid(2947648e-2521-473d-9274-07bd5c38a701),Revision(default)),NodeId(root),dd3d7bf4-231d-4434-ad80-61367690f0da,htop,htop,2022-02-25T15:30:55.000Z,Presence of package htop in any version  was correct)
 [report] ResultSuccessReport(2022-02-25T15:30:58.000Z,RuleId(RuleUid(32377fd7-02fd-43d0-aab7-28460a91347b),Revision(default)),DirectiveId(DirectiveUid(2947648e-2521-473d-9274-07bd5c38a701),Revision(default)),NodeId(root),4a542919-f5a0-43b6-a756-fa8d96e758db,htop,htop,2022-02-25T15:30:55.000Z,Presence of package htop in any version  was correct)
 [report] ResultSuccessReport(2022-02-25T15:30:58.000Z,RuleId(RuleUid(32377fd7-02fd-43d0-aab7-28460a91347b),Revision(default)),DirectiveId(DirectiveUid(2947648e-2521-473d-9274-07bd5c38a701),Revision(default)),NodeId(root),26d74f7b-673a-4554-82ee-6e7bfb56433d,vim,vim,2022-02-25T15:30:55.000Z,Presence of package vim in any version  was correct)

[2022-02-25 15:34:05+0000] TRACE explain_compliance.root - Compliance for rule '32377fd7-02fd-43d0-aab7-28460a91347b': [[root: 32377fd7-02fd-43d0-aab7-28460a91347b; run: 2022-02-25T15:30:55.000Z;20220225-153403-b10c0977->2022-02-25T15:40:55.000Z]
  compliance:[p:0 s:3 r:0 e:0 u:0 m:0 nr:0 na:0 rd:0 c:0 ana:0 nc:0 ae:0 bpm:0]
  [2947648e-2521-473d-9274-07bd5c38a701 =>
    htop:[htop(<-> htop):[Success:"Presence of package htop in any version  was correct"]]
    htop:[htop(<-> htop):[Success:"Presence of package htop in any version  was correct"]]
    vim:[vim(<-> vim):[Success:"Presence of package vim in any version  was correct"]]
]]


Files

testing_unexpected_reports.json (1.79 KB) testing_unexpected_reports.json Félix DALLIDET, 2022-03-09 11:54

Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Related to Rudder - Bug #20880: Removed report in compliance when calling several times the command_execution with same valueReleasedFélix DALLIDETActions
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF