User story #2581: New datas from inventory (fusion 2.2.x) without touching rudder informations - Rudder - Issue Tracker

Custom queries

8.1 beta
Bugs triage
CS - by priority
CS - to review
My TR
Need technical review
Open bugs (all)
Open bugs (UI - UX)
Open UX defects (all)
Opened by users

Actions

Copy link

User story #2581

closed

New datas from inventory (fusion 2.2.x) without touching rudder informations

Added by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 12 years ago. Updated over 9 years ago.

Status:

Released

Priority:

N/A

Assignee:

Vincent MEMBRÉ

Category:

Web - Nodes & inventories

Target version:

2.4.0~beta3

Pull Request:

UX impact:

Suggestion strength:

User visibility:

Effort required:

Name check:

Fix check:

Regression:

Description

We could integrate some new datas from inventory (process, VM , CPU, Environment variable)

we would take almost all informations from fusion inventory (less promises)

It would prepare a more important modification in future (2.6?)

Related issues 4 (0 open — 4 closed)

Related to Rudder - User story #1020: FusionInventory integrate VM management and Rudder PT's one is redundant	Rejected	Vincent MEMBRÉ	2011-03-03	Actions
Has duplicate Rudder - User story #748: Client name should be "CFEngine Community" instead of "Community"	Rejected	Nicolas CHARLES	2011-01-31	Actions
Has duplicate Rudder - User story #2502: Display new inventories within Rudder	Rejected	Vincent MEMBRÉ	2012-05-30	Actions
Has duplicate Rudder - User story #2479: FusionInventory integration to Rudder	Rejected	Vincent MEMBRÉ	2011-03-03	Actions

Issue # Delay: days Cancel

History
Notes
Property changes
Associated revisions

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE over 12 years ago

Target version changed from 46 to 47

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 12 years ago

Status changed from In progress to Discussion
Assignee changed from Vincent MEMBRÉ to François ARMAND

To have a good Json serialisation of our new datas, we need to serialize org.joda.datetime and Box

We could build our own custom serializer (with lift-json) but there's also a project lift-json-ext from the same project which propose some working serializer

Do you think we could add that dependy withou any problems ??

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Vincent MEMBRÉ over 12 years ago

If we could use Box instead of Option in invenories we could have more meaningful datas in our inventories

I.e Sometime date of process have a bad format (2012-04-19 2100:0 , 2100 seconds is not good), and using a box we could put a Failure("bad format : the date" instead of a None
and we coudl do that in numerous case

that's why i need to serialise in Json!

I could also do a custom serialiser ? which solution is better ? add a dependency or a custom serializer (based on a dependency we already have) ?

Actions

Copy link