Bug #3807
closed
MIgration from Rudder 2.3.13 to 2.6.3 could not work if indexes which does not exist are added in the slapd.conf
Added by Nicolas PERRON almost 11 years ago.
Updated about 9 years ago.
Description
During a migration from a server Rudder 2.3.13 to 2.6.3, the migration didn't work because of LDAP configuration. It stopped at the use of an index "isActivated":
[...]
The Rudder OpenLDAP schema is not up to date.
You will see some warnings about UNKNOWN attributeDescription.
Updating...
...done.
Some cpuSpeed attributes were converted to integers in the LDAP database
slapd[4543]: [INFO] Using /etc/default/slapd for configuration
slapd[4548]: [INFO] Killing OpenLDAP with force...
slapd[4550]: [OK] slapd process killed with force (PID 1110)
slapd[4551]: [INFO] Killing OpenLDAP replication with force...
slapd[4557]: [INFO] Found no slurpd process running
/opt/rudder/etc/openldap/slapd.conf: line 84: index attribute "isActivated" undefined
slapadd: bad configuration file!
dpkg : erreur de traitement de rudder-inventory-ldap (--configure) :
[...]
It seems that the problem came from unexpected indexes which should have been added manually.
- Subject changed from MIgration from Rudder 2.3.13 to 2.6.3 does not work because of the LDAP configuration from the package rudder-inventory-ldap to MIgration from Rudder 2.3.13 to 2.6.3 could not work if indexes which does not exist are added in the slapd.conf
- Target version changed from 2.6.4 to 2.6.5
- Target version changed from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6
- Target version changed from 2.6.6 to 2.6.7
- Target version changed from 2.6.7 to 2.4.11
- Target version changed from 2.4.11 to 2.6.8
- Target version changed from 2.6.8 to 2.6.9
- Target version changed from 2.6.9 to 2.6.10
- Target version changed from 2.6.10 to 2.6.11
hum, since it is about migrating from 2.3, shouldn't we reject this ticket ?
- Target version changed from 2.6.11 to 2.6.12
- Target version changed from 2.6.12 to 2.6.13
- Status changed from New to Discussion
- Assignee changed from Nicolas PERRON to Jonathan CLARKE
Nicolas CHARLES wrote:
hum, since it is about migrating from 2.3, shouldn't we reject this ticket ?
I suppose we should. Jon, do you agree ?
- Target version changed from 2.6.13 to 2.6.14
- Target version changed from 2.6.14 to 2.6.16
- Target version changed from 2.6.16 to 2.6.17
- Target version changed from 2.6.17 to 2.6.18
- Target version changed from 2.6.18 to 2.6.19
- Target version changed from 2.6.19 to 2.6.20
- Status changed from Discussion to Rejected
- Assignee deleted (
Jonathan CLARKE)
- Project changed from 34 to Rudder
- Category set to Packaging
Also available in: Atom
PDF
Updated by Nicolas PERRON 
Updated by 
Updated by 
Updated by 
Updated by Matthieu CERDA 
Updated by 
Updated by