Project

General

Profile

Actions

User story #5672

closed

Expose rudder groups of a node as cfengine classes

Added by Florian Heigl about 10 years ago. Updated about 8 years ago.

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
2
Category:
Web - Nodes & inventories
UX impact:
Suggestion strength:
User visibility:
Effort required:
Name check:
Fix check:
Regression:

Description

It would be great if the defined groups of a node would be visible / usable as cfengine classes inside policies.

Random use case example:
Use them in variables in a ncf file template?


Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Is duplicate of Rudder - User story #7424: Add cfengine classes for each group of a nodeReleasedNicolas CHARLES2015-12-08Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Matthieu CERDA about 10 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
  • Category set to Web - Nodes & inventories
  • Status changed from New to Discussion
  • Assignee set to Nicolas CHARLES
  • Target version set to Ideas (not version specific)

Well, that's an interesting idea, giving to NCH for evaluation :)

Actions #2

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES over 9 years ago

Florian,

I'm not sure i understand your need..
Would you like to have:
- class with name of group defined ? (node is in group "prod server, so class "prod_server" is defined)
- variables with list of groups of the node ?
- variable with list of nodes that are in the groups ?

Actions #3

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 9 years ago

Florian,

Could you explain more in details your need on this one ?

Actions #4

Updated by Florian Heigl about 9 years ago

I might need a few attempts at getting this right.

First one would be if you want to push down some more logic into a template, not creating a rule for every one of 100s of locations.
If I could say in the template

[%CFEninge r.group_locA:: %]

something

[%CFEninge r.group_locB:: %]

something else

I could skip on putting up 100 variables and 100 rules.
This isn't yet a good example, I guess one might also get there by using a data file pushed to every system.

Accordingly the answer would be:
- class with name of group defined ? (node is in group "prod server, so class "prod_server" is defined)

Actions #5

Updated by Olivier Mauras about 9 years ago

Yes "Prod Servers" would make a class "prod_servers"
My example would be the following:

Real actual life example

${rudder.param.rudder_file_edit_header}
root
${generic_variable_definition.CRON_ALLOW_ATLASSIAN}
${generic_variable_definition.CRON_ALLOW_PERFORCE}
${generic_variable_definition.CRON_ALLOW_ORACLE}

This requires me to first set some empty CRON_ALLOW_{ATLASSIAN,PERFORCE,ORACLE} empty variables, then have them populated per each one of the groups

This would become in a mustache template:

{{vars.rudder.param.rudder_file_edit_header}}
root
{{#classes.atlassian_servers}}
jira
confluence
crowd
{{/#classes.atlassian_servers}}
{{#classes.perforce_servers}}
perforce
{{/#classes.perforce_servers}}
{{#classes.oracle_databases}}
oracle
{{/#classes.oracle_databases}}

Way easier to handle, reduce maintenance, better clarity, less interface interactions when modifying content, and no useless rules rebuilding.

Actions #6

Updated by Olivier Mauras about 9 years ago

  • Priority changed from N/A to 2
Actions #7

Updated by Benoît PECCATTE about 9 years ago

That is doable, we would need a Rudder variable, let's say NODE_GROUPS that would be a list just like MANAGED_NODES_NAME is.

We would then use it in a system technique to define new classes matching these groups.

Actions #8

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES over 8 years ago

This as being implemented in #7424, released in 3.2

Actions #9

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES over 8 years ago

  • Is duplicate of User story #7424: Add cfengine classes for each group of a node added
Actions #10

Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 8 years ago

  • Status changed from Discussion to Rejected

Rejecting, as it has been implemented in #7424

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF